Quote:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winsor_Pilates
Not nearly as short sighted as your arguement. Just because there's other ways to kill people, doesn't mean that guns aren't a problem.
|
Where did I say they were not a problem? I didn't.....typical CP liberals not reading what people wrote and making **** up.
Quote:
|
By your arguement, we shouldn't even stop gansters from carrying guns, because they'd just use a car if we did that.
|
What the?????? What the hell are you talking about. I said banning guns will not solve your problems. It only takes the guns out of the hands of law abiding citizens. But for some reason you folk can't figure that out. You can't get it through your liberal brains that by banning guns thats all that happens....you think that criminals are going to abide by the law. Thats why they call them criminals. Good lord man... The firearms laws we have on the books now are stiff. The problem is the judges will not enforce them.
Quote:
|
And it's funny that the people who use your arguement are usually the same people that want to control the third world in their race for nuclear arms.
|
What??? It's funny that the same people that think it's ok for other countries to have nuclear capacities....think no person should have a firearm. Wake up.
Quote:
Why stop N.Korea from having nukes? If we do, they'll just kill people with other methods instead.
|
|
Look... I never said that firearms are not a problem. All I said was banning them will solve nothing...nothing at all. The same reason why NK should not have Nukes is the same reason fully automatic firearms are illegal.