View Single Post
Old 06-05-2016, 04:37 PM   #121
Mike F
Franchise Player
 
Mike F's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Djibouti
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jayswin View Post
It is actually reportedly true, you just have it backwards. The NHL reportedly decided they weren't going to continue going to the Olympics which was absolutely about money, and then the World Cup of Hockey was revived to replace the Olympic participation, only with the NHL now making all the money.

It's fine to say you're okay with how everything is happening, but you'd be fooling yourself to say the World Cup of Hockey isn't about the money and that it has little to do with Olympic participation.

This was a completely calculated, money driven decision. Full stop.
Yes, it was money driven. I never denied that. But the NHL was never directly making money off of the Olympics and was only ever hoping to get some tangential benefit through increased exposure. I.e. the aim of the WC, making money, would be as present whether the league goes to the Olympics or not.

They held a WC in 2004 even though the NHL went to the Olympics in 2002 and were going back in 2006, because the league and union wanted the money. Same thing here.

If most of the problems I listed can be solved the NHL will go to the Olympics, whether there's a WC or not. It's unlikely, but they would.

Last edited by Mike F; 06-05-2016 at 04:43 PM.
Mike F is offline   Reply With Quote