View Single Post
Old 02-23-2016, 12:20 PM   #569
CliffFletcher
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by polak View Post
Yeah I think people saying Granlund has "proven" anything in the NHL are jumping the gun.
He's the only Flames forward prospect to make it to the show this year. He was playing on the team two days ago, and a highly-paid veteran is down in the minors. Spin it however you like, Granlund cracked an NHL lineup. Shinkaruk hasn't. If you want to call Granlund's floor a tweener who bounces between the NHL and the minors, then fine. Shinkaruk's floor isn't even that, as he's far from a blue chip prospect, and Treliving himself calls him a project.

I'm okay with the trade. And I agree that Shinkaruk has more upside. I'm simply pointing out the blindingly obvious fact that Granlund has shown that his floor is an NHLer (even if a fringe one) and Shinkaruk hasn't.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flames Draft Watcher View Post
Well that's assuming Granlund is WYSIWYG. At age 22 it's highly unlikely he's peaked. Reasonable to assume he can and will continue to develop and get better. Confidence could be key for him, a couple goals and he may suddenly be more of a scorer or possession driver.
Don't you get it? Now that he's no longer a Flame, at 22 Granlund is a fringe NHLer who is as good as he'll ever get. While players like Ferland (23), Arnold (23), Jankowski (21), and Poirier (21) are still learning the game, and it's far too soon to make any judgement calls about their full NHL potential.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze View Post
If this day gets you riled up, you obviously aren't numb to the disappointment yet to be a real fan.

Last edited by CliffFletcher; 02-23-2016 at 12:24 PM.
CliffFletcher is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to CliffFletcher For This Useful Post: