Quote:
Originally Posted by dying4acup
He is a good value signing, and somebody is going to get lucky.
He made some impulsive choices, perhaps agent influenced, but he was confident in his game, and he didn't see a future here when he wasn't offerred, or wasn't interested in a contract extension here.
I mentioned the "grass isn't always greener" thing earlier in this thread.
BUT, who would have guessed that NHL GMs would get smart all at the same time in one summer and decided not to spend money impulsively and reactively?!?
Definately not Glencross and his agent, and definately not me.
I could still see him getting 3yr/10M.
|
I would be surprised if anyone signs him to more than 2 years. Glencross has proven he lacks the consistency for any team to do that. I predict 2yr/4M.