Quote:
Originally Posted by squiggs96
I get that not everyone has posted on Day 7, but I figured if you were a passenger that received the spore on Night 6 and then sent it somewhere, you'd want to make some time to come back here and let us know what happened. This leads me to believe I might be correct that Seb was killed by the Captain to regain the spore.
|
There's something I'm not getting. How does no on revealing they had the spore confirm to Squiggs96 that SebC was killed by the host? Yes he was right, but what's the exact line of thinking.
If no one reveals, all we can say is that a turned was very likely made (or the host received the spore from a turned). It shouldn't have increased or decreased the chances that the Captain killed SebC. Someone, anyone, explain the logic to me. I don't want to hear Squiggs96 say "I was right," I don't care if he was right, I want to know how he arrived at his conclusion. I do not see a connection with no one revealing and SebC being killed by the host.
Maybe I'm not thinking this through but he might as well had said "If it rains today, 6+4 is 10." You might be right about your last statement, but I don't know how come raining had anything to do with it.
Follows it up with:
Quote:
Originally Posted by squiggs96
To follow up on the previous post. I have a suspicion some of the Agent reveal talk was to ensure the town thought the Agent was still town. If the Captain killed Seb it might have been to help convince us the Agent is still on our side when it might not be the case.
|
No surprise here, just like he's done with Puxlut, he's casting doubt on the Government Agent. He knows that town knows we're in a possible lynch or lose scenario, he knows we're getting a reveal. Better strike first and hope that not everyone is convinced that the Government Agent is still town.