Quote:
Originally Posted by starseed
Because squiggs was trying to pull attention away from SebC by leaving him out of his townie list.
I am sorry for the devo vote, but at the same time, I think he was not taking strong stances and actively scum hunting. His game seemed a lot like someone trying to stay in the background. However, this will not keep me from voting for anyone else who is not actively participating.
I think that the Squiggs/peanut jump on Oling was used in advance of the devo town flip to show early that they were not on board the devo lynch. Why would devo not have been a good candidate? And out of all of the posters, I think Oling would be the most likely to at least not be host, if not town. Why would a host make that Day one claim?
I think squiggs is going to be my target today, pending a review of vote history etc.
|
It wouldn't be a mafia game without Oling and starseed targeting me. Starseed, if you are town, remember what happened last game. It will be the exact same thing here. Exactly the same. This time I won't forgive. It was a bad play last time, and it's a worse play this time.
I voted for Party on Day 5 because I thought he was most likely to be a host. I did mess around for a bit to have some fun, but I put my vote back to where it was originally. I didn't think devo was a host. It's that simple. I've had my doubts about Oling the entire game, but some of that is left over from last game. I think Peanut and I were just annoyed with Oling being Oling. Oling was the one who wanted to continue to pester me about the Seb stuff. I had repeatedly talked about it, so I didn't think I needed to rehash it. The same thing happened last game. In this game it's funny that Oling gets all pissy when I didn't feel the need to talk about Seb, but when I wanted to talk about the spore he became all defensive and says that me talking about the spore puts him in a bad position and I need to stop talking about it. When he wants something it's okay, but when I want something it's not.