Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkajz44
Oling, so the motivation of Squiggs actions were to avoid the GA from checking Seb then? Or are you also implying he might have been trying to hint to Seb that he was a host? Or maybe both?
|
I think his motivation was to avoid SebC from being investigated. He did it in such a way that SebC should have picked up that he was trying to protect him. However, it was also just too obvious because SebC was pretty much confirmed town and Squiggs96 didn't mention him. Either a huge town mistake, or a pretty ballsy Host plan.
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrkajz44
How does that fit into Seb's vote against Squiggs? I guess at that point it was a bit of a throw-away vote with Starseed having so many votes already.
|
I had mentioned a couple times that I thought SebC should be checked (mainly because I thought Squiggs96 protecting him was weird). Maybe he thought him voting for squiggs96 would be a good way to distance himself from Squiggs96 and hopefully not get investigated that night (you can even see he mentioned that he didn't want to "waste" an investigation). If he was investigated even tonight instead of last night, it would be hard to say when he was actually turned for sure, the longer he doesn't get investigated the less of a connection he has with Squiggs96.
Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC
vote: squiggs96
I'd rather not waste an investigation.
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by mrkajz44
I'd like to go back and read that exchange again (it was a bit painful the first time!), but I'd like the full context of what you are suggesting.
|
It was painful, but it was intentionally so. I wanted Squiggs96's post to be as clear as possible but he was being pretty vague on why he didn't include SebC originally. And then as he kept getting pressured he starts saying I was twisting his words or something and getting stuck on semantics when really he had no explanation as to why SebC wasn't an option for the spore, if the host did send it to a "confirmed townie."