So I voted for ActiveStick originally to hopefully prod him into posting more and voting, so we'd have a record of his actions to refer back to later.
Since then, he's made the following posts:
QUOTE=activeStick;5310591]Are we forcing people to vote here? I'm not convinced of anyone yet to be honest. Don't want to lynch anyone either just to vote someone out.[/QUOTE]
Leads with a question, then suggests inactivity, which is the number one thing that benefits the scum. If we don't vote someone out, we just get 0.5 days closer to losing every time, and lose our biggest way of gaining knowledge.
Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick
We just have to careful about looking for things that aren't there.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick
If we don't get the 6 votes, does nobody get killed?
|
Another question about how the game works, which has often been a scum tactic to derail analysis/conversation. Girlysports did this well last game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick
Sorry, meant to add would that be advantageous or not? I guess it depends. We wouldn't have anymore information after the night unless things happen during the evening I guess.
|
Leads with a question again. This concludes three short posts with very little content, basically the same question. Seems designed to get post count up without providing any actual analysis or information that could be used against him later in the game.
Quote:
Originally Posted by activeStick
Aren't the numbers 3/17 for scum, 14/17 we lynch our own assuming our own didn't turn?
If we don't lynch our own guy and the infected doesn't turn, we stay with 14 guys. If we lynch our own guy and the infected turns, we have 12 guys.
I suppose we need to decide, as a group if we go for a pile on lynch or not.
|
Leads with a question again, comments that we need to decide as a group if we should do a lynch or not.
____________________________________
So my comments are that of the 5 posts since I voted for him, 4 start with questions about the game, none have any scum hunting in them, and the general idea seems to be to not lynch, which is a terrible town strategy. Combining that with laying low, innocuous posting to pad post count, and not voting suggests to me that activestick could be scum trying to lay low and not make waves.
I've already voted for him so can't vote again - but have two suggestions.
1) Activestick - vote for someone, and post who you think is scum and why.
2) Passengers - Read through his posts and see what you think. We need to lynch someone and I think he's a strong candidate.