01-26-2015, 04:09 PM
|
#841
|
|
Could Care Less
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoforever
Bollig, Engeland, Raymond...
One good move, Hiller.
Pattern. Trelliving's record is nothing spectacular so far.
If you give a break to an inexperienced GM as learning on the job, then moves like we have seen in the past from our GM's can never be scrutinized.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoforever
I'm very concerned that our GM has picked busts in Engelland, Raymond, Bollig.
He gave up assets and term. It shows what kind of judge of talent he is.
Interesting that Knight is setting AHL on fire, while Shore who many thought should have automatically been given an NHL spot that he didn't earn, has done very little. How competent is our GM?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoforever
Good guess. Wouldn't Jay be getting nailed for those additions?
Anyway, good thing that Jays's prospects and additions are doing well.
Knight has been doing well prior to the trade too, but I will patiently wait for Shore to show what Trelliving has seen for years.
Yeah, a 3rd isn't much for nothing, Cammy for nothing isn't much either, keep the count rolling, of how much isn't much?
Little mistakes, no big deal, free pass, etc.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoforever
If the chances are so small, we should scrap amateur scouting staff.
Why bother drafting other than in the first round, let's use Oiler formula for success, we should have followed Sabres blueprint.  |
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoforever
Yeah, I almost forgotten:
Hudler, Russel, Wideman,
Monahan, Johnny, Poirier, Grunland, etc.
Was the scoring machine Blair one of Jays?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoforever
Yes, some were. Poirier over Skunkaruk, smarter than the other guys in the room for going off the imaginery "board". Failure to sign Erixon.
Wideman, a 6-7 dman.
No credit for Monahan as it was an obvious pick........
Johnny is too small
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by theoforever
I heard that Jay, changed the staff and added to it.
|
PS are you drunk?
PPS you're just cherry picking things to strengthen your argument and discrediting any good decisions by saying "he shouldn't get any credit because it was so obvious".
|
|
|