Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
So I think that voting for the least active is a bad strategy now that we have votes on the board. We know the mafia will ensure their people are reasonably active and we know mafia don't want to look like pile ons but want to be part of the majority.
I suspect we have a better than chance probability of choosing one of the 3 4 or 5 votes on bizarro. Bizarros inactivity to me suggests he is town.
So I am going to vote for the 4th vote on bizarro rather than an inactive
|
Inactive town players are harmful to the town. Even the rules state this.
I don't completely disagree with your assessment. Mafia likely will be trying to cause the least waves and fly under the radar. However, I've been saying to go for an inactive player from the start to encourage players to post, including posting lists of players who aren't following the 1 post a day rule. It should come to no surprise I voted for the least active player. So I don't agree with your assessment that I "piled on" regardless of when I made my vote.
I'm also not following the logic to protect a player who has a single post three days after the game started. If multiple votes aren't getting him to post, how would his mafia friends encouraging him to post if we lucked out and he was inactive and evil? If he was mafia, I could see his mafia friends jumping to try and save him with the hope/knowledge he will be replaced for inactivity at this point. So if by chance he ends up mafia, I think you should be the prime suspect.