Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14
LPOs are legally authorized to detain people. "Resisting arrest" might be the wrong exact terminology, but that would simply be case of arguing semantics The thief has no legal right to use a weapon to resist. Again, he was not acting in self-defence. That was straight-up assault with a deadly weapon.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho
They have the authority to detain without warrent, that's not a bad start
|
They are Wal Mart employees, why do they have that authority? That's garbage, and I would never respect that.