Quote:
Originally Posted by Split98
Actually, MOST Flames fans who actually watch the team know that Huds is a natural LW and Colborne has only played RW for half the season. So don't be a snotty ass when there's an easy rebuttal against you.
|
Huds played RW all last year. He played centre early in his career for Detroit. Natural LW? C'mon.....
Quote:
Originally Posted by Split98
Secondly, Setoguchi played 1st line just fine on SJ. Which, if you watch hockey, was a much better team than our 2014 roster. Setoguchi has not 'capped' out at 3rd line, he's fallen to 3rd line and is looking to regain his game. Which, was 1st line. And for someone who watches so much hockey, you listed 4 players for the '2nd and 3rd line'. You're aware that there are 6 players on the 2nd and 3rd lines right?
|
Are you for real? Seto just signed a 1 year contract just barely over league minimum with the 4th worst team in the league in late August. 29 other teams saw no value in him. You're calling him a first liner? You really don't watch hockey, nor do you know what etc means.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Split98
And finally, how is 'investing' (a 1 year low contract isn't 'investing', but I digress) in ONE PLAYER who is TWENTY SEVEN doing anything negative for the kids. The post you quoted me on I stated then that the kids have all opportunity to oust a position from Setoguchi or Jones. Were you just going to ignore that point and state yours over and over again, or do you actually have a point against Setoguchi losing his spot besides "he'll be grumpy"?
|
I never said anything about him being grumpy. Are you delusional?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Split98
Bonus: If you want to be credible yourself, spell Poirier right. Not to mention, he's injured. I wouldn't be penciling in an injured and unproven prospect on the 1st line just yet there slick.
|
Sad defense mechanisms at work here. You've resort to spelling errors when you're clearly not an English major. This is how you use quotations: "[T]he post you quoted me on I stated...". Pot calling the kettle black, indeed.