[Zevo]

That is what you were arguing. You clearly stated that "those" tunnels and their actual purpose was for supplies. Once you are proven wrong, you change the goalposts rather than admit it.
It's as clear as Flash said, there's no point debating with people who have a clear bias. I'm done with you.

Originally Posted by Chill Cosby

This has already been proven inaccurate, why maintain the myth?

Why do posters like yourself, Nage, and blankall continue to make false claims that have been proven wrong by reputable sources?

Originally Posted by Chill Cosby

Of course:
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...-palestinians/



If you genuinely hadn't read the link, then I apologise, but there it is for a bit of reference on the history of those tunnels and what their actual purpose was.

Originally Posted by Chill Cosby

Yeah, absolutely. We're talking about the context of your post, correct? If Israel wasn't a factor, why would the tunnels exist?

To clarify, I'm not arguing that they don't exist, but rather that your comment:

"If Israel stopped, Hamas would re-arm and build tunnels with the sole purpose of attacking Israel."

Which is similar to a comment like:

"If Hamas stopped, Israel would continue relentlessly bombing Gaza."

It simple ignores the actual purpose and timeline of the act you're concerned with.