Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames
There are probably 29 GMs out there that see more value in scooping up Gillies and Ortio over Reinhart. Perhaps I personally underrate him but watching him up here with the club he didn't look like a guy I'd put in the company of the 1st rounders ranked just ahead of him. Don't see any top end skill, just a guy who could be a smart, tough nosed 3rd liner, but I'd never place those kinds of guys ahead of our future in goal. Do any believe he's stepped up his game to the point where his ceilling/projection can be reconsidered? From what I've seen he's a surer thing now, but nothing more than he was going to be before. Anyways, going to leave it at that.
|
Great points. I agree, our goalies may be more valuable in trade than Reinhart. It's too bad you don't leave at that more often.
Quote:
Originally Posted by djsFlames
Also..post above, you call it "whining" when it's hardly that. I'm calling it as it is. All but Wotherspoon have been forwards thus far, hence the 'hard on'. If you can't handle a little debate then why are you on here in the first place? If we all just agreed with each other there'd be no use for a ####ing forum. At least I'm attempting to make these poll threads interesting. Which leads me to believe that you're the one whining, since you can't get with the program, and instead are taking offence for others since I don't agree with them, when most of them don't give a damn, and if anything, probably enjoy the discussion.
|
The polls are already interesting without making broad strokes about the board having "hard ons" for forwards. As others pointed out, that is because the majority of our top prospects are forwards and because goalies are historically very random in their development. What program can't I get with exactly?
Quote:
Originally Posted by fotze
I'm curious who DjsFlames think we are idiots for picking
|
Guess I'm not the only one who's noticed your tendency to deride others opinion if it doesn't follow yours