Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
Yeah he was and the evidence is in the prospect rankings thing we did over the summer where guys like him and Cundari were ranked ludicrously high by fans.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
I dunno. I felt both guys were better prospects at the time without the use of a crystal ball.  |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
No just proving that fans here overrated Horak. At least I can go back to those threads and pick out the posts where I was saying the same things then as I am today that he was going to be an AHL tweener.
|
From your link:
11. Horak
12. Granlund
14. Reinhart
Holy shart. You could fit the grand canyon between those rankings!
The seasons the each player had following the summer 2013 rankings:
Horak
AHL - 53GP - 21G - 27A - 48PTS (.91 ppg)
NHL - 2GP - 1G - 0A - 1PT
Granlund
AHL - 52GP - 25G - 21A - 46PTS (.88 ppg)
NHL - 7GP - 2G - 1A - 3PTS
Reinhart
AHL - 66GP - 21G - 42A - 63PTS (.95 PPG)
NHL - 8GP - 0G - 2A - 2PTS
EE, what exactly did Granlund/Reinhart accomplish this year to suggest they are so far ahead of Horak that you find it humourous that anyone could have lumped all 3 together last summer?
As for not needing a crystal ball... You may want to consider one. You had Knight 5th, ahead of Jankowksi, Granlund, Reinhart, Bouma, Klimchuk, Poirier, and Wotherspoon.