Quote:
Originally Posted by GoJetsGo
I certainly can, and have little interest in your semantics. The root of your problem with Jankowski is that you have a pessimistic view of what he'll amount to and that's why you feel that pick was a bad gamble. I can't count the number of people who've responded to you with the exact same logic you're laying out here, yet you've continued with that schtick over and over and over.
Someone here suggests Granlund's ceiling is a 3rd liner and you are dismayed that anyone would assert that when we have no idea at present and suggest we need to wait and see. It's hypocrisy, plain and simple.
|
I've never put a ceiling on Jankowski, I hope he's another Joe N. Jankowski's progress is about where it's expected. The problem is that Feaster and Weisbrod should know what his expected progress would be and should have reconsidered choosing him there. My beef is with the people that chose him, not with the player. Now that he's been chosen, I hope he tears up the college circuit.
and the someone didn't suggest Granlund's ceiling, he declared it. Quite the difference.