Quote:
Originally Posted by afc wimbledon
The problem with Burke and Feaster is not how they are different but how they are the same, both were bought onboard in order to 'help' the existing GM, both were not, in theory, replacements, while in practice everyone saw them as the mark of death for the existing GM and this turned out to be true.
It would be nice for once if the owners showed some cajones and just went ahead and fired someone at the effective end of playoff contention and then went through a thorough hiring process into the off season.
Burke at least promises to be his own man but the whole organization still reeks of uncertainty and an inability to make proper timely decisions.
|
Burke says he's an impatient man but when it comes to hiring a new GM, he says he's going to be very patient. I don't blame him as the new hire will be slated to replace him when Burke gets fired.