Quote:
Originally Posted by CaramonLS
Not really.
One of the defining characteristics of the Jay Feaster regime is that he really had a difficult time understanding the value of assets. Frequently assets were held on for too long, signed to questionable extensions or they were misused.
This was an example of an asset he was forced to deal, but would not have made the deal under optimal circumstances.
|
This is ridiculous. This trade had nothing to do with understanding the value of assets.
The Flames organization tried very hard to sign Erixon. He led them on and then screwed them (yes them, as it wasn't just Feaster - he inherited the problem).
Erixon screwed them and Feaster made the most of the situation.
Not a huge trade in the grand scheme of things, but by no means a black mark on his record in any way, shape or form.
To attempt to criticize Feaster for the Erixon situation simply ignores the facts and screams of bias.