Quote:
Originally Posted by PlayfulGenius
That's fine, but still doesn't mean it's a bad idea to help make sure the Canucks have to overpay a bit to keep Tanev... I think it's a good move, potentially... I think those types of moves can backfire in future years though when the tables turn.
|
ya someone could do that potentially, by the time it hurts though I don't think the cap will matter
revenues were great this year so far, I imagine the cap is back up close to 70 next season as well, so it won't be much of an issue