Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
You are right. No need to go there. I just find it strange that one guy gets to make definitive statements based on limited viewings, but another states his opinion, and says it is just that, and gets attacked for stating his opinion. We'll know how this all plays out in a month, then how it really plays out in five years.
|
What attack? If questioning how many times you've seen a player is an attack then you are guilty of it as well. No need to get so defensive. Your opinion on Monahan could very well turn out to be right. But based on the scouting reports and from what I've seen your comparisons of Monahan to McNeill/Niedermayer are pretty terrible.
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
Henry, how have you seen the players in question so much to formulate such a concrete opinion?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by New Era
The comparison may be stupid, but just how many times have you seen Monahan to make that judgment? Seems you have access to the exact same resources everyone else has access to, so what makes your judgment better than others? I don't know how you can claim someone's opinion is wrong when all you are doing is posting your opinion based on similar information? It wouldn't be the first time some high scoring player on a crappy team ended up being a washout. Having said that, Monahan could be the greatest thing since Gretzky. He'll have to prove that after he's drafted though.
|