Quote:
Originally Posted by Tinordi
That article does not pass your own ridiculous burden of proof standards that you place on positions you disagree with. The author repeatedly states that these are assumptions.
Bur further, this actually could be used to further my point that King dropped the ball by taking the wait and see approach and seeing the debacle unfold in Edmonton. Maybe that's why ownership is upset because wait and see meant not getting your foot in the door for municpal money.
You see, that's the thing people are throwing around ideas. You can disagree with them but unless you know and that's not about posting articles built on a solid foundation of baseless speculation, you're just as likely to be wrong as me.
|
At least Res comes up with some links. You just spout off your self-important nonsense and expect the Board to treat it as gospel.
It might be nice if you backed up your 'facts' with some real facts every now and then.