View Single Post
Old 11-14-2012, 12:04 PM   #204
HOOT
Franchise Player
 
HOOT's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: @HOOT250
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by YYC in LAX View Post
Is there any chance that the complete legalization of pot and in-store sales would actually increase the cost? i.e. Canada's high tax rates for alcohol/tobbaco.

Or is the idea (for legalization advocates) to have in-store sales as well as people growing out of their homes and selling privately under the table?
This is something I wrote out on the last page:

Quote:
Originally Posted by HOOT View Post
Let's assume it would cost $60/oz to produce, even though it should be much lower, cigarettes cost about $15 a carton to produce and that's almost 8oz of tobacco.

Carton of Marijuana(1oz) - 8 Packs(1/8oz):

Cost to Manufacture: $60.00
Federal Excise Duty: $4.26
Provincial 'Tobacco' Tax (BC): $55.50
Wholesale Margin (10%): $11.98
Total Wholesale Cost: $131.74

Cost Per 'Pack' (1/8oz): $16.47
Retail Markup (20%): $3.29
HST (BC): $2.37
Total Price/Pack: $22.13

Few things to note:

- Federal Excise Tax $2.13 for tobacco
- Provincial Tobacco Tax (BC) is $37.00 for tobacco
- Wholesale Margin is 6% for tobacco
- Retail Markup is 13% for tobacco
- HST (12%) isn't charged on tobacco

Currently 1/8oz costs an average of $40-50. So for their to be a profitable black market the government would really need put excessive taxes on marijuana, even more than the 1.5-2x I estimated compared to cigarettes. Now if they actually taxed it like tobacco and cost to manufacture is closer to the real thing, we would be looking at ~$10.35 for 1/8oz to the consumer.
Assuming the government used the taxes and profit margins for marijuana that I listed above you would be looking at ~$6,000,000,000 in tax revenue, $1,200,000,000 in sales for the manufacture and $330,000,000 in retail sales. Currently right now that money goes into the pockets of organized crime.

So I guess the question is, who do you want to have $7.5b in their pockets, government and tax paying companies or criminals?
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by henriksedin33 View Post
Not at all, as I've said, I would rather start with LA over any of the other WC playoff teams. Bunch of underachievers who look good on paper but don't even deserve to be in the playoffs.
HOOT is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to HOOT For This Useful Post: