Quote:
Originally Posted by HPLovecraft
He means exactly what Rathtji says.
|
Then you didn't read what Rathji wrote. He made the ridiculous claim that because the poster didn't think religion should be a protected class under hate crime laws that it somehow equates to that poster believing that crimes motivated my religious hate should be LEGAL. That's quite a bit different than saying crimes motivated by religion should be just as illegal as crimes not motivated by religion.
Quote:
|
What I see is someone that doesn't believe religion should an identifiable group because he deems it worthless.
|
I agree that is what he said. It still doesn't make Rathji's ridiculous assumption any less ridiculous.