Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainCrunch
I don't know if I agree with what your saying.
In the private world there are probably thousands of examples of individuals inside of organizations that have gone "rogue" so to speak.
The stock brokers who break their own organizations rules with backside trading.
The guy at HP who basically manufactured orders and PO's
The lady at airport security who robbed passengers during her search.
In each of those the organization isn't guilty its the individual.
It could very much be the same case here.
It almost sounds like your in a hurry to condemn the Cons before the investigation is complete.
Unless there's a direct chain of funding evidence or other things linking this robocall scandal to senior leadership in the conservatives, then its the act of rogue individuals.
And suppossedly the evil conservatives would put together a much more insideous conspiracy then this.
|
I don't think that anyone is trying to condemn the conservatives anymore than the evidence suggests. The reality is that these people (candidates, campaign workers, etc.) represent the party though. If I run some ponzi scheme from my office then my securities dealership would not only be implicated by association, but would be questioned for involvement as well. When a political party has these issues they're held to a similar standard. The CPC seemed to have no qualms about tarring every Liberal as a probable criminal because of the sponsorship scandal, and as a result they should expect nothing better if they're not beyond repproach.