Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta
I'd like to also be more reassured that there were more cameras filming arguably the most important military installation in the world. I also find it really skeptical that more footage hasn't been released, if there were more cameras.
I've also heard that the Marriott Hotel had a camera facing that exact part of the Pentagon, which was promptly confiscated and never released publicly.
Simply showing footage that clearly shows a plane smacking into the Pentagon would alleviate all concerns - without question.
In the age of technology, I just find it strange that the best footage we have of the most devastaing terrorist attack in the history of America on the most prolific military installation in the world is grainy, choppy, unrecognizable footage from a gas station.
|
No it wouldn't. People would just find something else to try and poke holes in. They'd argue that the video was doctored or fake, they'd argue that it doesn't look like a 757, they'd argue that was a military plane, etc. Some people can be faced with a mountain of evidence to the contrary and still hold steadfast in their positions.
Look what happened with Obama's birth certificate. He'd proven his citizenship many times along the way but some people refused to believe him. He released his short form birth certificate, again some people refused to believe him. Hawaii's Department of Health publicly stated that they had his original birth certificate which proved that he was born in Hawaii, yet again, people poked holes in that and said if he'd just release his long form birth certificate then it'd all be over. So Obama did release his long form to the public and people were arguing that it was altered or photoshopped.