I think whether or not the use of force was appropriate or not has been beaten to death.
My point is that he and/or his colleagues are lying through his teeth. Either that or they have extremely poor observational skills coupled with short term memory loss. Both characteristics you wouldn't expect your average cop to have.
This fella obviously has a problem with the truth and is right up there with cement truck driver fella in my books for failing to take any responsibility for his actions.
Here he is appealing for his licence back after killing someone whilst under the influence.
Quote:
But while under suspension from service for the accident, Robinson appealed the suspension of his drivers' licence, maintaining he got drunk immediately after the accident.
According to court documents, Robinson said he had two beers at a party early in the evening, roughly five hours before the accident.
Robinson then told police he left scene of the collision, and in the 10 minutes he was gone, he had two shots of vodka, suggesting those two shots drove his blood-alcohol level beyond the legal limit.
Robinson told police he returned to the accident site after drinking the vodka shots, according to court documents.
The judge questioned whether two shots were enough to cause Robinson's blood-alcohol level to exceed .08 per cent.
The judge ruled that given the fact that Robinson offered no evidence around how much alcohol was in those shots, where they came from, or how they were consumed, there was no basis to find fault with the decision to suspend his licence.
|
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/british-col...g.html?ref=rss
That's a perfectly normal thing to do after a RTA. Leave the scene, have some vodka, and return.
Of note:
"investigators recommended charges of impaired driving causing death and impaired driving, but the Crown has yet to lay charges."
Anyone give me a good reason why?