Quote:
Originally Posted by nickerjones
So my "transitive property of football" (or whatever you said) logic doesnt work but your arguing that your logic does? You just said head to head is the only thing that matters and thats why you think Texas is better than Oklahoma but you still say UT is better than tech ( whom if you dont remember beat Texas head to head)
Well after watching Texas play ohio state im thinking you might be wrong about a rematch.... If Ou's offense is even half of what it was during the season its twice as better than what Ohio state had out there, hell their starting qb was struggling hitting his warm up partner much less receivers on the field. I guess I cant really sway your argument but it doesnt really matter seeing as how Oklahoma is in the National title game and Texas isnt. That really gives our BCS answer, Oklahoma is better than Texas because the Natonial Title game is played between #1 and #2 ..... Whether you like it or not thats just the way it is ....
|
I don't think Texas Tech is better than UT, but if OU had not blown out Tech I would have had no problem with Tech getting the nod over Texas because they beat us fair and square. BCS means nothing to me it's a joke and pretty much all the world knows it.