Adulterous woman told to pay husband - Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Jetsfan · 02-19-2009, 03:10 PM

200 000.00 Euros in damages for cheating on him and pretending that their children, who were fathered by her lover, were his.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/news...%20amages.html

Bagor · 02-19-2009, 03:12 PM

Nice. Hopefully he can bill the father for childcare costs.

StoneCole · 02-19-2009, 03:15 PM

applause. Chalk one up for men everywhere. About time one of these stories went our way.

mykalberta · 02-19-2009, 03:17 PM

Finally the law comes out on the side of the good guys.

The Fonz · 02-19-2009, 03:33 PM

"DNA tests showed that three of their four children had been fathered by the other man, the Times reports."

"In her defence, the woman told the court her extramarital activities had been “passionate and irregular” and blamed her husband for being cold, unfaithful and disinterested in the children."

What? Your husband is disinterested in the children, so to solve this you go and get knocked up by someone else a couple more times? Alrighty then...

troutman · 02-19-2009, 03:34 PM

I note they had one child together, three were not.

I doubt very much this woman has $200K euros.

Russic · 02-19-2009, 03:37 PM

So he was disinterested in the kids she had with another dude? What an ass. I suppose he didn't know they weren't his, but that doesn't sound like a very fun marriage in the first place.

burn_baby_burn · 02-19-2009, 03:59 PM

Sounds like the Maury show. Except for the compensation part.

Cowboy89 · 02-19-2009, 04:05 PM

I'm a little reluctant to declare this a victory for men everywhere or a victory for 'good' guys. For all we know this guy could be a real grade A ######, but in relative terms only marginally better than his wife. Sometimes even being part of the idiot parade which is marriages like this implies not just one dysfunctional character. That being said it's comforting to know that in this case bias wasn't on the side of the woman.

troutman · 02-19-2009, 04:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fotze

You lawyers are always so "male version of misogynistic".

I think the technical term is Oprah/Dr. Phil viewer.

alan21 · 02-19-2009, 05:04 PM

They looked so happy together!

Sidney Crosby's Hat · 02-19-2009, 05:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by burn_baby_burn

Sounds like the Maury show. Except for the compensation part.

I wonder if it went something like this...

Dion · 02-19-2009, 06:50 PM

GreenTeaFrapp · 02-19-2009, 06:59 PM

We'd have a lot less of these issues if adultery was punishable by public stoning. And by stoning I mean the biblical type, not the Vancouver type.

Locke · 02-20-2009, 11:06 AM

She was clearly an undeniable slut and unconscionable bitch.

mikey_the_redneck · 02-20-2009, 11:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Locke

She was clearly an undeniable slut and unconscionable bitch.

Agreed. Women have a very protected image in our Western culture, as if they are innocent angels. Just look at the justice system, divorce laws etc. Women are capable of being nasty people just as men are.

GreenLantern · 02-20-2009, 12:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck

Agreed. Women have a very protected image in our Western culture, as if they are innocent angels. Just look at the justice system, divorce laws etc. Women are capable of being nasty people just as men are.

Bitches be crazy.

We all know this.

Dion · 02-20-2009, 12:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mikey_the_redneck

Agreed. Women have a very protected image in our Western culture, as if they are innocent angels. Just look at the justice system, divorce laws etc. Women are capable of being nasty people just as men are.

Agreed! I happen to know someone who was taken to the cleaners by his ex wife. She was a manipulative mean spirited and spiteful bytch who worked the court system to her advantage and had the little girl put up for adoption