Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-26-2008, 04:00 PM   #1
fredr123
Franchise Player
 
fredr123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default New Government Savings Program.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/background/bu...gs-account.pdf

Tax Free Savings Account (TSFA) announced today by the Conservative government. "An RRSP is intended primarily for retirement. A TFSA is like an RRSP for everything else in your life."
fredr123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:05 PM   #2
4X4
One of the Nine
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

So if I open one on the day they're introduced, I can wait 20 years and then suddenly deposit $100,000?
4X4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:08 PM   #3
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Wouldn't it have been less confusing if they just raised the personal exemption amount by another $5,000? Or am I totally interpreting this wrong?
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:08 PM   #4
Reaper
Franchise Player
 
Reaper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: I'm right behind you
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 4X4 View Post
So if I open one on the day they're introduced, I can wait 20 years and then suddenly deposit $100,000?
The pdf says that you can save $5,000 per year so I would imagine that amount is based on deposits in a calendar year. However, it also says you can carry unused amounts forward to future years. It sounds like a nice way for the government to accomodate money laundering to me.
__________________
Don't fear me. Trust me.
Reaper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:10 PM   #5
4X4
One of the Nine
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper View Post
The pdf says that you can save $5,000 per year so I would imagine that amount is based on deposits in a calendar year.
But it also says that unused contribution space is carried over. Also, after withdrawing, you're allowed to re-contribute the amount withdrawn, as well as the max for that year.
4X4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:10 PM   #6
ah123
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Here
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ View Post
Wouldn't it have been less confusing if they just raised the personal exemption amount by another $5,000? Or am I totally interpreting this wrong?
The way I read it is that you can invest $5000 and by designating the account as a TFSA, you don't have to pay any taxes on the gains/interest earned (so I can buy $5000 worth of GICs or mutual funds and the money I made is not taxable)
ah123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:12 PM   #7
fredr123
Franchise Player
 
fredr123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper View Post
The pdf says that you can save $5,000 per year so I would imagine that amount is based on deposits in a calendar year. However, it also says you can carry unused amounts forward to future years. It sounds like a nice way for the government to accomodate money laundering to me.
Interestingly, it says you can bank your deposit limit each year and rollover whatever you don't use for future years. That was nice.

I think the idea is to give Canadians an incentive to save more dough. Simply raising the personal exemption by $5,000 wouldn't necessarily result in people socking away the difference.

I'm eagerly anticipating MoneyGuy and slava's takes on this and other announcements today.
fredr123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:13 PM   #8
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Okay, I read the PDF file. It makes sense. Contributions to this TFSA is not tax deductable, but the investment grows tax-free and withdraws are not added to your taxable income.
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:14 PM   #9
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I would have preferred to somehow have capital gains not hit when taking money from one investment and putting it into another outside of an RRSP.. this lets me do that, but $5000 a year isn't very much.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:16 PM   #10
albertGQ
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by photon View Post
$5000 a year isn't very much.
It is to me! I want to max my annual RSP contribution limit and my TFSA. That is going to be difficult year in and year out...........at least for me it is.
albertGQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:19 PM   #11
Isbrant
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Would you be able to get a loan to put into your TFSA and get a tax deduction for the carrying charges on the loan?
Isbrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:19 PM   #12
Bring_Back_Shantz
Franchise Player
 
Bring_Back_Shantz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: In my office, at the Ministry of Awesome!
Exp:
Default

So basically it's a way to save taxes on capital gains is that correct?

The way I understand it is it is kind of the opposite of an RRSP.
With an RRSP the money you put in isn't taxed, but when you take it out it is.

With this it looks like you're putting in after tax dollars, but whatever you earn is all yours and isn't taxed when you take it out.
That's pretty cool I guess.
__________________
THE SHANTZ WILL RISE AGAIN.
<-----Check the Badge bitches. You want some Awesome, you come to me!
Bring_Back_Shantz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:33 PM   #13
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by albertGQ View Post
It is to me! I want to max my annual RSP contribution limit and my TFSA. That is going to be difficult year in and year out...........at least for me it is.
In the long term I guess it is ok, but I'm just thinking from current investments point of view, at only $5000 a year it's going to take a while to get everything in there.

They should make in retroatctive so that you start out with the space as if it had started long ago.. If I could roll $85,000 into this right now I'd be pumped.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:37 PM   #14
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

So, if my wife doesn't have any income (she takes care of the baby), I should do all of our savings together in a TFSA in her name?
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:39 PM   #15
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I don't think it matters since there's no immediate tax implications from this, it's after-tax income right?
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:39 PM   #16
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Says starting in 2009
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:53 PM   #17
Claeren
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Section 218
Exp:
Default

If it does what it is supposed to do, and improve the national average savings rate, that is great. It will be interesting to see if the masses/middle class and below use it, or just the people who were already saving...

But if it works - combined with ongoing surpluses, tax reduction and debt reduction (absolute and as a percentage of GDP) - we are very much the envy of the first world, no? Along with a now healthy pension fund and a relatively (comparative terms) robust young population and we are well positioned for the next 30 years at least.



Claeren.
Claeren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 04:57 PM   #18
Flames89
First Line Centre
 
Flames89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Toronto, ON
Exp:
Default

If there ever was a venue to put some more "high-risk" assets in ...

No Capital Gains?!

Sounds like a great idea to spur savings from the population ...
Flames89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 07:59 AM   #19
FLAMESRULE
First Line Centre
 
FLAMESRULE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: The centre of everything
Exp:
Default

I agree, this is a great idea. I read in teh globe yesterday that credit card debt was up big time in the US. Implementing a plan to help Canadians save and make some decent gains without capital gains is a good thing.

Now they just need to work on getting double taxed through capital gains when you sell a recreational/second property.
FLAMESRULE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-27-2008, 08:59 AM   #20
Slava
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

The details of the account are severly lacking at this point. I don't see a reason that you couldn't borrow and invest into the account...but the deductions are going to be very small. Based on prime today you could write off a whopping $287/year! (For your initial $5k)

I do like the idea. I understand why they didn't, but I do wish it was more than $5,000 per year. If they went higher it would virtually replace the RSP in some respects.

As far as what kind of investment to hold here there are really two trains of thought. it would be a great account to take some big risks if they pay off because the amounts can be withdrawn without tax on any of it. The other prudent thing to do though could be to invest in interest bearing investments here....capital gains are already tax favourable.

Basically what this account amounts to is a total of $235k for every Canadian to invest with tax sheltered growth in their adult life. (Assuming that this goes from ages 18-65...though it could go to age 71 or beyond). There are some huge limitations to that amount, but the idea is interesting.

(I would hate to be a discount brokerage when this bad boy hits the market!!! Enjoy all of the accounts for people to trade $5k at a time though!)
Slava is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:57 AM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy