Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 07-25-2013, 11:17 PM   #1
kobasew19
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Exp:
Default Corey Pronman's list of top 10 Flames prospects

http://www.hockeyprospectus.com/arti...articleid=1559

Good read and he seems like a very knowledgable writer. I've heard him on the radio a few times. I believe he's somewhat of a regular guest on the Team 1260 in Edmonton.
kobasew19 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to kobasew19 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-25-2013, 11:38 PM   #2
sun
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Not cheering for losses
Exp:
Default

Haven't seen depth like this in our prospect pool since... when? Pretty exciting. A defensemen or two in the top ten would be nice though.
sun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2013, 11:44 PM   #3
GettinIggyWithIt
Scoring Winger
 
GettinIggyWithIt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Overall I can't disagree with the names in the top ten but I think Wotherspoon, Sieloff or Reinhart should replace Hanowski. Granlund is also listed a bit high in my opinion as well.

A much better prospect base for sure though.
GettinIggyWithIt is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GettinIggyWithIt For This Useful Post:
Old 07-25-2013, 11:50 PM   #4
SebC
tromboner
 
SebC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: where the lattes are
Exp:
Default

Seems like we have a lot of small players. I wonder if the Flames lean towards size in the next draft to balance that out a bit.
SebC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 12:11 AM   #5
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
Seems like we have a lot of small players. I wonder if the Flames lean towards size in the next draft to balance that out a bit.
From that list only Gaudreau is small, Baertschi is pretty average at 5'10".

Hell our top 3 centre prospects are all 6'2" or taller.
AC is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Old 07-26-2013, 12:26 AM   #6
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by SebC View Post
Seems like we have a lot of small players. I wonder if the Flames lean towards size in the next draft to balance that out a bit.
They kind of addressed it this past draft. I believe only Klimchuk and Glimour were only less than 6'. Everyone else is 6'2'' or taller.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 12:29 AM   #7
Caged Great
Franchise Player
 
Caged Great's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Klimchuk, Baertschi and Gaudreau are the only significant players under 6 feet and the first two don't play like they're short.
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
Caged Great is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 12:43 AM   #8
Miniac
#1 Goaltender
 
Miniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Perth Australia
Exp:
Default

Good read. He states Flames are ranked 10th in the NHL, which is very respectable for a team in the midst of a rebuild. Its very exciting as a fan to finally see the depth of the Flames' pipeline! Lots of potential but greater patience is required.

This is my list, pretty obvious (well to me at least) who the top 3/4 prospects are:
Spoiler!


I put Sven at #1 just because of his AHL/NHL experience.
This is not a perfect list by any means but its a getting feeling to be able to list off Calgary Flames prospects for once.
Miniac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 12:51 AM   #9
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The top 15 in that list is very promising. I say 15 because Ramage should rightfully be included. He stood out in my limited video viewings of the prospect camp.
dammage79 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 07-26-2013, 06:07 AM   #10
Da_Chief
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2007
Exp:
Default

I like the fact in the weakness section of almost all these players it said they need to gain strength. Thats easy enough to do with some dedication.

Really don't know how Gaudreau is going to turn out but one thing he does is that he always has his head up, which is huge so he can see a hit coming. You can be the biggest guy and try to cross the blue line with your head down and see what happens, ask Big E.

Looks promising. Next draft we target D.
Da_Chief is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 06:50 AM   #11
Canada 02
Franchise Player
 
Canada 02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

I think Seiloff and Gillies are top 5, and Agostino is higher than Hanowski
Canada 02 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 06:59 AM   #12
devo22
Franchise Player
 
devo22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Austria, NOT Australia
Exp:
Default

I don't agree with leaving out Sieloff from the top 15, and Hanowski at 9 is a bit of a head scratcher. But other than that, it was a good read and a fair assessment. Not surprising though, Pronman is good.
devo22 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 07:07 AM   #13
ClubFlames
Posted the 2 millionth post!
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Hanowski is too high on the list. Sieloff/Agostino should have been in the Top 10. Also, I would have put Gillies a spot higher than Granlund just because of what he was able to achieve as a freshman.

Best part of the article was how Corban Knight is described as an ace in faceoffs, lord knows we can use one in the lineup.
__________________

ClubFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 07:13 AM   #14
Vinny01
Franchise Player
 
Vinny01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

I agree Monahan is #1 I think he has more potential to be a franchise player than Sven. Also think Hankowski is not top 10 and Worthorspoon should be in his place
Vinny01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 07:32 AM   #15
GreenLantern
One of the Nine
 
GreenLantern's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Space Sector 2814
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ClubFlames View Post
Hanowski is too high on the list. Sieloff/Agostino should have been in the Top 10. Also, I would have put Gillies a spot higher than Granlund just because of what he was able to achieve as a freshman.

Best part of the article was how Corban Knight is described as an ace in faceoffs, lord knows we can use one in the lineup.
Agreed, Sieloff and/or Wotherspoon both deserve a spot in that top 10 over Hanowski or Granlund.
__________________
"In brightest day, in blackest night / No evil shall escape my sight / Let those who worship evil's might / Beware my power, Green Lantern's light!"
GreenLantern is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 07:51 AM   #16
Erick Estrada
Franchise Player
 
Erick Estrada's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
Exp:
Default

So the Flames used a 22nd pick on a guy with less promise than Hanowski? Kind of killed his credibility right there and while I'm not on the Poirier bandwagon he has to be considered a better prospect than Hanowski or he would be an absolutely terrible 1st round pick.
Erick Estrada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 07:59 AM   #17
MrMastodonFarm
Lifetime Suspension
 
MrMastodonFarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

I don't much care for a list of players, really once you get past the first "group" it's basically a free for all. Enjoyed the write-ups though, more knowledgeable then most.
MrMastodonFarm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 08:15 AM   #18
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

I agree with the consensus that Hanowski doesn't show NHL player potential like Wotherspoon and Sieloff do. My list:

1. Monahan/Baertschi
2. Monahan/Baertschi
3. Gaudreau
4. Knight
5. Gilles
6. Klimchuk
7. Jankowski
8. Poirer
9. Wotherspoon
10. Horak

Not sure if Horak has "graduated" the rankings or not but surprised not to see him mentioned as he is clearly smart enough for the NHL
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-26-2013, 08:19 AM   #19
Northendzone
Franchise Player
 
Northendzone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Exp:
Default

18 posts in and nobody has trashed this media guy....WTF CP!!!!
__________________
If I do not come back avenge my death
Northendzone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Northendzone For This Useful Post:
Old 07-26-2013, 08:35 AM   #20
JiriHrdina
I believe in the Pony Power
 
JiriHrdina's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada View Post
So the Flames used a 22nd pick on a guy with less promise than Hanowski? Kind of killed his credibility right there and while I'm not on the Poirier bandwagon he has to be considered a better prospect than Hanowski or he would be an absolutely terrible 1st round pick.
Why should he tie his rankings to draft position. I don't really have a ton of time for this guy - but I admire the fact that he has the conviction to state opinions that are much different than the norm. If every prospect list was just a re-stating of where kids were drafted, it would be pretty dull.
JiriHrdina is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JiriHrdina For This Useful Post:
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:41 PM.

Calgary Flames
2024-25




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021 | See Our Privacy Policy