07-22-2009, 10:04 PM
|
#81
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: still in edmonton
|
Would a shot luck part be less fun if their were strippers
|
|
|
07-22-2009, 10:04 PM
|
#82
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alltherage
I think that discussion would improve if people stopped trying to start fights rather than debates. See, I love to debate, but people never understand that and get into juvinile arguments instead.
|
Fair enough but it take two people to argue be it juvenile or otherwise.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to J pold For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-22-2009, 10:10 PM
|
#83
|
Missed the bus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by J pold
Fair enough but it take two people to argue be it juvenile or otherwise.
|
Yeah, but I said instigate, not engage.
And Yeah Baby, you know, I'm coming around to the stripper thing. I think I was more pissed that they wouldn't do the party the way I wanted. I don't care anymore.
|
|
|
07-22-2009, 10:11 PM
|
#84
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by J pold
Fair enough but it take two people to argue be it juvenile or otherwise.
|
No it doesn't, poo-poo head.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimbl420
I can wash my penis without taking my pants off.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23
If edmonton wins the cup in the next decade I will buy everyone on CP a bottle of vodka.
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FireFly For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-22-2009, 10:16 PM
|
#85
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FireFly
No it doesn't, poo-poo head.
|
Stop quoting me or I'll get cooties.
|
|
|
07-22-2009, 10:17 PM
|
#86
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alltherage
Yeah, but I said instigate, not engage.
|
Come on now, you're going to tell me that you have never engaged in a juvinelle argument on Puck? I don't think one of theregular posters could make such a claim, expect Cowperson.
|
|
|
07-23-2009, 01:55 PM
|
#87
|
Missed the bus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by J pold
Come on now, you're going to tell me that you have never engaged in a juvinelle argument on Puck? I don't think one of theregular posters could make such a claim, expect Cowperson.
|
Oh of course I have. Mostly with you, actually. But it's usually because like I said, I like to debate. Usually these delinquent arguments come up because someone purposely ignores a point to make some funny comment or burn... but a part of my brain just doesn't want to skip my perfectly valid argument.
For example:
Me: I don't want strippers at my bachelor party. Is this party for me or for my friends?
You: Stop being a pansy and check out the titties.
That's not what I was asking. I want to have a conversation, not a flame war. The frustration comes from the fact that someone says some inflammatory comment and I want to get things back on track, so I throw my own little jab, try to "right the ship" if you will, but it usually doesn't work that way.
Now all of a sudden I'm defending my morals and my opinions against being a pansy or whipped or something... when in reality, what I really was asking is, should my wishes be respected at my bachelor party?
Then I start to realise that someone is just egging me on, trying to get a rise out of me, or how you so transparently put it "trying to get me banned" for your own entertainment. That's just dumb. I think your more likely to get yourself banned from that kind of thing.
Bottom line is, a lot of people are sick of this kind of posting. I know of about 4 or 5 people who honeslty do this for shats and giggles, when really the vast majority of us want healthy discussion, not flame wars.
If you want this place to be more like the Canucks forum, keep posting this way. I facking hate that board though.
Last edited by alltherage; 07-23-2009 at 02:08 PM.
|
|
|
07-23-2009, 02:29 PM
|
#88
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
|
The old "I want to get back on topic and take the last shot" strategy? I'm not sure that is part of a "perfectly valid argument". Pretty tricky one to pull off.
Quote:
If you want this place to be more like the Canucks forum, keep posting this way.
|
Ooohhhhh there it is; trying to get in a final shot.
It is obvious you are familiar with Canuck board practices; if they bother you so much you should just leave them on the canucks board.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bobblehead For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-23-2009, 02:39 PM
|
#89
|
Missed the bus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead
The old "I want to get back on topic and take the last shot" strategy? I'm not sure that is part of a "perfectly valid argument". Pretty tricky one to pull off.
Ooohhhhh there it is; trying to get in a final shot.
It is obvious you are familiar with Canuck board practices; if they bother you so much you should just leave them on the canucks board.
|
Thats not a shot at J pold, its a shot at people who post that way.
Also, I do think a shot for shot is pretty valid. If someone walks up to me and smacks me in the face, he's going to get it back.
Last edited by alltherage; 07-23-2009 at 02:43 PM.
|
|
|
07-23-2009, 02:44 PM
|
#90
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: in your blind spot.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alltherage
Thats not a shot at J pold, its a shot at people who post that way. Also, I do think a shot for shot is pretty valid.
|
Not if you are trying to get the thread back on topic.
If you want to go shot for shot then you may as well abandon the original topic. Even if you can do both you probably lose a lot of the people who would be interested in the debate.
Take the high road, ignore the shot, and if the person you are debating takes another shot they look like the ######.
__________________
"The problem with any ideology is that it gives the answer before you look at the evidence."
—Bill Clinton
"The greatest obstacle to discovery is not ignorance--it is the illusion of knowledge."
—Daniel J. Boorstin, historian, former Librarian of Congress
"But the Senator, while insisting he was not intoxicated, could not explain his nudity"
—WKRP in Cincinatti
|
|
|
07-23-2009, 02:46 PM
|
#91
|
Missed the bus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead
Not if you are trying to get the thread back on topic.
If you want to go shot for shot then you may as well abandon the original topic. Even if you can do both you probably lose a lot of the people who would be interested in the debate.
Take the high road, ignore the shot, and if the person you are debating takes another shot they look like the ######.
|
OK that's valid. I just feel like usually it's the same people over and over. It's something where I just want to shut them up, but I guess that's not really easy to do over teh interwebs.
|
|
|
07-23-2009, 02:51 PM
|
#92
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobblehead
ignore the shot
|
I thought the whole thread was about shots?
|
|
|
07-23-2009, 02:55 PM
|
#93
|
Jordan!
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Chandler, AZ
|
Who mixes shots like that?
|
|
|
07-24-2009, 01:15 AM
|
#94
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reaper
I have never thrown a hissy fit in my life.
However we are all men, we know the consequences. If we touch someone without their permission then be prepared to fight. period.
I wouldn't try to avoid the "Buck Taffy". I'd simply beat the shat out of anyone who did it to me. A beatdown is a form of accountability for those brave enough to "Buck Taffy" me.
BTW, Buck Taffy is an idiotic term. The correct term is "he got chiefed." I made it clear to everyone I knew that if they were thinking of chiefing me that the consequences would be 100x worse than whatever they could think of.
|
What if the guy that did it could beat the shat out of you? Oh wait you're invincible.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Clarkey For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-24-2009, 08:19 AM
|
#95
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by J pold
Stop quoting me or I'll get cooties.
|
So you don't like girl cooties? Well you've got them now!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grimbl420
I can wash my penis without taking my pants off.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Moneyhands23
If edmonton wins the cup in the next decade I will buy everyone on CP a bottle of vodka.
|
|
|
|
07-24-2009, 09:18 AM
|
#96
|
Missed the bus
|
Mmmm.... I'm going to drink wine tonight. I love wine. We should have a delicious wine thread.
|
|
|
07-24-2009, 09:41 AM
|
#97
|
Lifetime Suspension
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: CP House of Ill Repute
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alltherage
Mmmm.... I'm going to drink wine tonight. I love wine. We should have a delicious wine thread.
|
Malbec FTW
|
|
|
07-24-2009, 10:38 AM
|
#98
|
Missed the bus
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenTeaFrapp
Malbec FTW
|
PKNT is a really good chilean wine. Its a sweeter wine.. but no more so than a 1 or 2. It finishes smooth... sooooo good with red meats and pasta. Or just to drink.
I like the merlot personally.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:58 PM.
|
|