03-04-2024, 12:04 PM
|
#1
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Waiver wire Mar 4: Joel Hanley, Aaron Dell, Matthew Phillips
|
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:05 PM
|
#2
|
|
All I can get
|
Last edited by Reggie Dunlop; 03-04-2024 at 04:03 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Reggie Dunlop For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:05 PM
|
#3
|
|
Franchise Player
|
are there 2 Matthew Phillips?
__________________
Peter12 "I'm no Trump fan but he is smarter than most if not everyone in this thread. ”
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:07 PM
|
#4
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Makarov
are there 2 Matthew Phillips?
|
No. Pitt claimed him from Washington a few weeks ago.
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jg13 For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:07 PM
|
#5
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Seeing as the Flames are poaching the hell out of the Wranglers, we may need to start nabbing some of this waiver bait to replenish the ranks.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:08 PM
|
#6
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Wouldn’t mind getting Hanley to replace Hanifin’s spot
__________________
Fireside Chat - The #1 Flames Fan Podcast - FiresideChat.ca
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:09 PM
|
#7
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
|
Claim Phillips then waive him for the purposes of putting him on the Wranglers. If someone else claims, oh well.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to TrentCrimmIndependent For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:09 PM
|
#8
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2021
Location: Richmond upon Thames, London
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caged Great
Wouldn’t mind getting Hanley to replace Hanifin’s spot
|
The bonus is easier nameplate edits.
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:12 PM
|
#9
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Makarov
are there 2 Matthew Phillips?
|
Is that you, Jim?
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to D as in David For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:22 PM
|
#10
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Vancouver
|
Washington will claim him (no one else does) and send him to the Bears. Just my guess.
__________________
"A pessimist thinks things can't get any worse. An optimist knows they can."
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:27 PM
|
#11
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David
Is that you, Jim?
|
Never gets old.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:29 PM
|
#12
|
Participant  |
Quote:
Originally Posted by FlamesAddiction
Washington will claim him (no one else does) and send him to the Bears. Just my guess.
|
They can’t claim him and then send him down.
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:29 PM
|
#13
|
|
First round-bust
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
They can’t claim him and then send him down.
|
They can if they're the only ones who put in a claim
__________________
"This has been TheScorpion's shtick for years. All these hot takes, clickbait nonsense just to feed his social media algorithms." –Tuco
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:31 PM
|
#14
|
Participant |
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion
They can if they're the only ones who put in a claim
|
Didn’t know that! Bit of a risk on their part I’d guess.
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:31 PM
|
#15
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by PepsiFree
They can’t claim him and then send him down.
|
Okay, I'll admit that I'm not 100% on waiver wire rules, but why not?
Isnt that what Pittsburgh just did? Washington waived him, Pittsburgh claimed him, now if Pittsburgh waives him and the Flames claim him, what stops them from waiving him again and re-assigning him to the AHL? Assuming nobody else claims him?
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:34 PM
|
#16
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Locke
Okay, I'll admit that I'm not 100% on waiver wire rules, but why not?
Isnt that what Pittsburgh just did? Washington waived him, Pittsburgh claimed him, now if Pittsburgh waives him and the Flames claim him, what stops them from waiving him again and re-assigning him to the AHL? Assuming nobody else claims him?
|
Because he never cleared waivers
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:37 PM
|
#17
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
If a team lost a player on waivers and re-claims a player in the same season and were the only team to put in a claim when they re-claimed him, they can assign a player directly to the AHL without needing waivers again.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:40 PM
|
#18
|
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
If a team lost a player on waivers and re-claims a player in the same season and were the only team to put in a claim when they re-claimed him, they can assign a player directly to the AHL without needing waivers again.
|
That's almost too obscure, but OK. You need a team that wanted him enough to claim him later waive him, then 30 other teams still not want him.
Has it ever happened before?
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:41 PM
|
#19
|
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Income Tax Central
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sureLoss
If a team lost a player on waivers and re-claims a player in the same season and were the only team to put in a claim when they re-claimed him, they can assign a player directly to the AHL without needing waivers again.
|
I remember when this used to be simple.
__________________
The Beatings Shall Continue Until Morale Improves!
This Post Has Been Distilled for the Eradication of Seemingly Incurable Sadness.
If you are flammable and have legs, you are never blocking a Fire Exit. - Mitch Hedberg
|
|
|
|
|
03-04-2024, 12:50 PM
|
#20
|
|
Some kinda newsbreaker!
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by #-3
That's almost too obscure, but OK. You need a team that wanted him enough to claim him later waive him, then 30 other teams still not want him.
Has it ever happened before?
|
If you think about it, it removes a redundant step.
Caps waive Phillips and loses him to Pens.
Pens waive Phillips and Caps are the only team to put a claim in.
Caps waive Phillips again to assign him to the AHL when no other team put a claim on him. - Why does this need to happen? You already established no other team wants the player.
|
|
|
|
|
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:32 AM.
|
|
