Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 06-17-2018, 08:37 PM   #14361
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
Brodie for a mid round first and a second?

Brodie has been really, really bad for 2 years, and you have his value close to the Hamilton trade value when the Flames got him.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
If Griffin Reinhart can get a mid round first and a 2nd, anything is possible.
sureLoss is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2018, 08:47 PM   #14362
Jeff Lebowski
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Exp:
Default

Who has more value in the eyes of GMs, Brodie or Hamonic? I realize it can be a question of individual team need but I guess I’m asking what’s more valuable:
Puck moving defenseman
Defensive defenseman

Both are LHS, same age and coming off down years. Why can’t Brodie net what Hamonic did

I don’t want Brodie traded, I just think people are underestimating his value around the league.
Jeff Lebowski is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Jeff Lebowski For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2018, 08:59 PM   #14363
Poe969
Franchise Player
 
Poe969's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Thunder Bay Ontario
Exp:
Default

In the old NHL, finding a pick moving defenceman was tough to do. Now, it's hard to find a stay at home guy who can keep up. Hamonic is way more valuable, the Flames don't have anyone like him in the system and IMO Buzz Kylington and/or Fox will be better than Brodie.

IMO Brodie has more value to the Flames if he's on a different team next year.
__________________
Fan of the Flames, where being OK has become OK.
Poe969 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Poe969 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2018, 09:07 PM   #14364
Major Major
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
Brodie for a mid round first and a second?

Brodie has been really, really bad for 2 years, and you have his value close to the Hamilton trade value when the Flames got him.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
I have no clue what Brodie's value is. I think he's a good second pairing guy, and the really really bad label you're giving him is unfair. I wouldn't part with him for anything less than that or a top 6 guy F of similar age.
Major Major is online now  
The Following User Says Thank You to Major Major For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2018, 09:23 PM   #14365
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

If Sami Vatanen is worth Adam Henrique, then so is Brodie.

Other than their handedness, they are very similar players, of a similar age with similar cap hits. Same production, etc..

If you put Brodie on the market and can't get a legit 40-50 point C or even a W+ of a similar age to Brodie, or a 1st and two 2nd's, then just keep him and see if he can regain his form from pre-GG. No sense selling low on him for the sake of change.

Brodie for Bjugstad plus a mid pick
Brodie for Nino plus a mid pick
Brodie for Coyle plus a mid pick
Brodie + a young C for O'Reilly
Brodie for Gallagher
Brodie for Connor Brown plus 25th overall
Brodie for Kapanen plus 25th overall
Brodie for Sprong plus two 2nd's

If you can't get these type of returns for Brodie, then there is no point in trading him. Keep him and hope he rebounds to 40+ point form. It will give Valimaki. Kulak and Kylington more time to develop, and if he does rebound people will be kicking down your door trying to take him off your hands.
Roof-Daddy is offline  
The Following 15 Users Say Thank You to Roof-Daddy For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2018, 09:26 PM   #14366
dammage79
Franchise Player
 
dammage79's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
If Sami Vatanen is worth Adam Henrique, then so is Brodie.

Other than their handedness, they are very similar players, of a similar age with similar cap hits. Same production, etc..

If you put Brodie on the market and can't get a legit 40-50 point C or even a W+ of a similar age to Brodie, or a 1st and two 2nd's, then just keep him and see if he can regain his form from pre-GG. No sense selling low on him for the sake of change.

Brodie for Bjugstad plus a mid pick
Brodie for Nino plus a mid pick
Brodie for Coyle plus a mid pick
Brodie + a young C for O'Reilly
Brodie for Gallagher
Brodie for Connor Brown plus 25th overall
Brodie for Kapanen plus 25th overall
Brodie for Sprong plus two 2nd's

If you can't get these type of returns for Brodie, then there is no point in trading him. Keep him and hope he rebounds to 40+ point form. It will give Valimaki. Kulak and Kylington more time to develop, and if he does rebound people will be kicking down your door trying to take him off your hands.
well thought out. You had me at Bjugstad, and then Kapanen.
__________________
"Everybody's so desperate to look smart that nobody is having fun anymore" -Jackie Redmond
dammage79 is online now  
The Following User Says Thank You to dammage79 For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2018, 09:38 PM   #14367
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
If Sami Vatanen is worth Adam Henrique, then so is Brodie.

Other than their handedness, they are very similar players, of a similar age with similar cap hits. Same production, etc..

If you put Brodie on the market and can't get a legit 40-50 point C or even a W+ of a similar age to Brodie, or a 1st and two 2nd's, then just keep him and see if he can regain his form from pre-GG. No sense selling low on him for the sake of change.

Brodie for Bjugstad plus a mid pick
Brodie for Nino plus a mid pick
Brodie for Coyle plus a mid pick
Brodie + a young C for O'Reilly
Brodie for Gallagher
Brodie for Connor Brown plus 25th overall
Brodie for Kapanen plus 25th overall
Brodie for Sprong plus two 2nd's

If you can't get these type of returns for Brodie, then there is no point in trading him. Keep him and hope he rebounds to 40+ point form. It will give Valimaki. Kulak and Kylington more time to develop, and if he does rebound people will be kicking down your door trying to take him off your hands.
These all sound pretty fair for a defenseman who:
- is 28 years old
- logs 20+ mins per game
- plays on the PP
- plays 3on3 overtime
- will score 30-45pts
- has 2 years remaining at $4.6mil per

Unless you are looking at it through disappointed flames fan tinted glasses.
Scroopy Noopers is online now  
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2018, 09:41 PM   #14368
savardandjokinen
son of looooob
 
savardandjokinen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I like all those proposals. Might have people disagree with this but I'd even want Montreal to add to Gallagher.
savardandjokinen is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to savardandjokinen For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2018, 09:43 PM   #14369
Snuffleupagus
Franchise Player
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Lebowski View Post
Who has more value in the eyes of GMs, Brodie or Hamonic? I realize it can be a question of individual team need but I guess I’m asking what’s more valuable:
Puck moving defenseman
Defensive defenseman

Both are LHS, same age and coming off down years. Why can’t Brodie net what Hamonic did

I don’t want Brodie traded, I just think people are underestimating his value around the league.
I would agree if Brodie was coming off one down year but it's been two years now, The only thing that make sense was Gulutzan insistence of the lefty/righty crap, hopefully Peters plays him RD, even if it's on the third pairing to start the season
Snuffleupagus is offline  
Old 06-17-2018, 09:54 PM   #14370
Madman
Franchise Player
 
Madman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by colbym72 View Post
Its pretty sad that in a Trade Rumours thread. I have to scroll through a few pages to find one actual rumour
Wait, what? There was an actual rumour in here?

Dammit, back to page 1 I go.
Madman is offline  
Old 06-17-2018, 10:11 PM   #14371
savardandjokinen
son of looooob
 
savardandjokinen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

This thread was made exactly a year ago today, when does the new thread start?
savardandjokinen is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to savardandjokinen For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2018, 10:24 PM   #14372
AC
Resident Videologist
 
AC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Saw that Johnny Gaudreau liked an Instagram post suggesting the Flames have been linked to Kevin Hayes.
AC is offline  
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to AC For This Useful Post:
Old 06-17-2018, 10:27 PM   #14373
Roof-Daddy
Franchise Player
 
Roof-Daddy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by AC View Post
Saw that Johnny Gaudreau liked an Instagram post suggesting the Flames have been linked to Kevin Hayes.
There is another good example.

Brodie for Hayes plus a 2nd, of which the Rangers have two.
Roof-Daddy is offline  
Old 06-18-2018, 12:55 AM   #14374
Zevo
First Line Centre
 
Zevo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheScorpion View Post
So Mexico and Cuba are no more?
Ya, I guess I don't consider them part of N.A.
Zevo is offline  
Old 06-18-2018, 02:33 AM   #14375
Snuffleupagus
Franchise Player
 
Snuffleupagus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy View Post
There is another good example.

Brodie for Hayes plus a 2nd, of which the Rangers have two.
I would do a Brodie/Hayes swap straight up and be very giddy about it.
Snuffleupagus is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Snuffleupagus For This Useful Post:
Old 06-18-2018, 05:06 AM   #14376
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
These all sound pretty fair for a defenseman who:
- is 28 years old
- logs 20+ mins per game
- plays on the PP
- plays 3on3 overtime
- will score 30-45pts
- has 2 years remaining at $4.6mil per

Unless you are looking at it through disappointed flames fan tinted glasses.
Fans who have been disappointed because Brodie has been absolutely terrible for two seasons.

You can't ignore that fact in assessing trade value.
The Cobra is offline  
Old 06-18-2018, 05:38 AM   #14377
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
Fans who have been disappointed because Brodie has been absolutely terrible for two seasons.

You can't ignore that fact in assessing trade value.
This isn’t remotely close to an accurate assessment.
Scroopy Noopers is online now  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
Old 06-18-2018, 07:24 AM   #14378
SofaProfessor
Scoring Winger
 
SofaProfessor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Snuffleupagus View Post
I would do a Brodie/Hayes swap straight up and be very giddy about it.
I really hope this isn't Brad Treliving's secret CP account...
__________________
SofaProfessor is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to SofaProfessor For This Useful Post:
Closed Thread

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:33 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021