Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-07-2018, 02:17 AM   #81
Party Elephant
First Line Centre
 
Party Elephant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Canterbury, NZ
Exp:
Default

There is no probability. Only snake.
Party Elephant is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Party Elephant For This Useful Post:
Old 02-07-2018, 09:42 AM   #82
Brick
#1 Goaltender
 
Brick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

50.2%

https://www.hockey-reference.com/friv/playoff_prob.cgi
Brick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 09:09 AM   #83
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winebar Kensington
Exp:
Default

56.7%
http://www.sportsclubstats.com/NHL/Western.html

Ducks falling out of it.
__________________
https://www.mergenlaw.com/
http://cjsw.com/program/fossil-records/
twitter/instagram @troutman1966
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 09:16 AM   #84
nfotiu
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
meh, they're still a 2-3 game win streak from being back in it. I consider the single digit percentages the hole that is too dig to deep out of and it looks like Chicago fell down that hole this week.

Looks like it's 8 teams for 5 spots now or 4 teams for the 2 divisional spots and we're right smack in the middle of both those battles.
nfotiu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 09:18 AM   #85
Otto-matic
Franchise Player
 
Otto-matic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Sector 7-G
Exp:
Default

14-10-4

Should be easily doable for this club to reach 96 points.

I'm starting to think though it may take closer to 100Pts to lock up a spot in the West this year.
Otto-matic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 09:25 AM   #86
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

All the California teams I think are still in the thick of it. Sure people have a game or two on Anaheim, but with 28 games there is a lot of wiggle room.

If I had to guess, I would expect LA to rise in the standing, particularly when they get Jeff Carter back. Without Mackinnon I would expect Colorado to go into a little dip. Chicago just doesn't have the goaltending to make the push. Once everyone gets down to 20 games or so I think we will know who will be involved in that final push.
Robbob is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 09:25 AM   #87
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winebar Kensington
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu View Post
meh, they're still a 2-3 game win streak from being back in it.
They have to win three more games than three teams ahead of them.
__________________
https://www.mergenlaw.com/
http://cjsw.com/program/fossil-records/
twitter/instagram @troutman1966
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 09:32 AM   #88
nfotiu
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto-matic View Post
14-10-4

Should be easily doable for this club to reach 96 points.

I'm starting to think though it may take closer to 100Pts to lock up a spot in the West this year.
98 will probably have your relying on tie breakers.

Looking at the standings. If LA got an OTL in their game in hand, and Col won theirs, and the season ended, there would be a 5 way tie for the 2 seed, 3 seed, second wild card and 2 spots out of the playoffs.

The 10th seed would have the same # of points as the divisional 2nd seed.

That's a pretty tight race!
nfotiu is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to nfotiu For This Useful Post:
Old 02-09-2018, 09:35 AM   #89
Corral
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Stampede Grounds
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
They have to win three more games than three teams ahead of them.
Exactly. And the loser points make this even more difficult. Too many folks talk about winning streaks like the team winning is doing it in a vacuum.
Corral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 09:46 AM   #90
nfotiu
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by troutman View Post
They have to win three more games than three teams ahead of them.
Nah, there's so many teams in the mix. If they won 3 in a row, the standings will take care of themselves. 10 games over .500 is in a spot now and probably will be for a week or so.
nfotiu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 09:57 AM   #91
Brick
#1 Goaltender
 
Brick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Exp:
Default

56.6%

https://www.hockey-reference.com/friv/playoff_prob.cgi
Brick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 10:12 AM   #92
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nfotiu View Post
Nah, there's so many teams in the mix. If they won 3 in a row, the standings will take care of themselves. 10 games over .500 is in a spot now and probably will be for a week or so.
Before losing on Weds the Oilers were on a 5-1-1 run in which time they actually LOST GROUND to every team on the playoff bubble. Having so many teams in the mix is precisely why it is that much more difficult to make ground up from behind.
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 11:09 AM   #93
nfotiu
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Virginia
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
Before losing on Weds the Oilers were on a 5-1-1 run in which time they actually LOST GROUND to every team on the playoff bubble. Having so many teams in the mix is precisely why it is that much more difficult to make ground up from behind.
No, they didn't. They gained some ground over that stretch if you look at any kind of standings format that accounts for games played, which is the correct way to look at it.
nfotiu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 11:47 AM   #94
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Just looking at the schedule, if you just take ANA, CGY, COL, DAL, LA, MIN, SJ, and STL there are 184 games left on the schedule that involve those teams. 40 of those games involve head to matchups with those teams.

Two ways to look at it. Potential for lots of extra points or if won in regulation points taken off the board. Calgary is actually in the least amount of those head to head games.

Anaheim 10
Calgary 7
Colorado 10
Dallas 12
LA 9
Minny 11
SJ 11
STL 10
Robbob is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Robbob For This Useful Post:
Old 02-09-2018, 12:10 PM   #95
Textcritic
Acerbic Cyberbully
 
Textcritic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: back in Chilliwack
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
Just looking at the schedule, if you just take ANA, CGY, COL, DAL, LA, MIN, SJ, and STL there are 184 games left on the schedule that involve those teams. 40 of those games involve head to matchups with those teams.

Two ways to look at it. Potential for lots of extra points or if won in regulation points taken off the board. Calgary is actually in the least amount of those head to head games.

Anaheim 10
Calgary 7
Colorado 10
Dallas 12
LA 9
Minny 11
SJ 11
STL 10
Interesting. I also see that the Flames have played more games in the WC than any other Pac Div team:

Cgy 33 GP
VGK 31 GP
LAK 30 GP
Edm 29 GP
Ana 28 GP
Arz 28 GP
Van 28 GP
SJS 26 GP
__________________
Dealing with Everything from Dead Sea Scrolls to Red C Trolls

Quote:
Originally Posted by woob
"...harem warfare? like all your wives dressup and go paintballing?"
"The Lying Pen of Scribes" Ancient Manuscript Forgeries Project
Textcritic is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Textcritic For This Useful Post:
Old 02-09-2018, 12:52 PM   #96
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Textcritic View Post
Interesting. I also see that the Flames have played more games in the WC than any other Pac Div team:

Cgy 33 GP
VGK 31 GP
LAK 30 GP
Edm 29 GP
Ana 28 GP
Arz 28 GP
Van 28 GP
SJS 26 GP
By my count only 8 of those remaining 17 games are against those 8 teams (4 of those are 2 each SJ and COL). I guess a lot less 4 point games to have to deal with, which from the hunted position can be beneficial.
Robbob is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2018, 12:57 PM   #97
Classic_Sniper
#1 Goaltender
 
Classic_Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbob View Post
Just looking at the schedule, if you just take ANA, CGY, COL, DAL, LA, MIN, SJ, and STL there are 184 games left on the schedule that involve those teams. 40 of those games involve head to matchups with those teams.

Two ways to look at it. Potential for lots of extra points or if won in regulation points taken off the board. Calgary is actually in the least amount of those head to head games.

Anaheim 10
Calgary 7
Colorado 10
Dallas 12
LA 9
Minny 11
SJ 11
STL 10
Nice work, I was looking into this as well and Dallas, Minnesota and St Louis will all be playing the California teams more than we do along with their own divisional teams. They have the toughest schedules going forward and these teams will all be taking points from each other which will help us especially if most of these games end in regulation.

The current pace to get in is 97 points but I could see it lowering to 95-96 points with all these head to heads. The good thing for our team is that we have the opportunity to play for 4 playoff positions whereas the Central teams only have 3. There’s s couple things going for us that gives us higher odds than other teams I would say from an optimist’s standpoint.
Classic_Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Classic_Sniper For This Useful Post:
Old 02-10-2018, 08:32 PM   #98
442scotty
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Flames really need to win the last 3 games on this road trip to stay in good shape. Lose all three and they can start dusting off the clubs...
442scotty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2018, 08:48 PM   #99
Moneyhands23
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: victoria
Exp:
Default

Flames have a really tough schedule for the rest of the month. Gotta start beating teams ahead of them in the standings.
Moneyhands23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-10-2018, 09:23 PM   #100
Robbob
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 442scotty View Post
Flames really need to win the last 3 games on this road trip to stay in good shape. Lose all three and they can start dusting off the clubs...
You are ready to call it a season based on 3 games when there is a third of the season left? Sooooo much hockey left.

Probably 6 teams in similar position.
Robbob is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:52 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021