Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 01-03-2022, 04:15 PM   #1001
Joborule
Franchise Player
 
Joborule's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Muta View Post
Put the Flames in WinSport, guaranteed sellout every game. Jack ticket prices up 500% so that almost no one can go except the super rich. Flames and City save money on new arena development, everyone wins (except for the 15,000 fans that now can't attend).

THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX
Actually though...would Tsuu Tina be interested in having the new arena in their Taza development? Right beside the casino? Wouldn't that be a interesting plot twist!
Joborule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2022, 04:22 PM   #1002
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Because prices on these mega projects go in one direction.

Take a commuter train to Banff - had they decided to do something like that in 1991, it would’ve cost hundreds of millions . Maybe it breaks a billion - now it’s likely such a multi-multi-billion Dollar effort that it’s not remotely worth doing.

There’s no reality where this project comes out costing less than $600M now that it needs to begin anew, just so they can arrive at the same place they already were.
But a pandemic that has supply lines and source materials challenged might sit out side the norm wouldn't it?

Inflation is pretty much a constant, but what we've seen on this building (up 28% or so in 18 months) is outside what you'd expect (3%)
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bingo For This Useful Post:
Old 01-03-2022, 04:30 PM   #1003
GreenLantern2814
Franchise Player
 
GreenLantern2814's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
But a pandemic that has supply lines and source materials challenged might sit out side the norm wouldn't it?

Inflation is pretty much a constant, but what we've seen on this building (up 28% or so in 18 months) is outside what you'd expect (3%)
Fair enough - is that what the Flames said though?

I think everyone would understand pausing the development before construction begins due to pandemic-related supply cost issues. That wouldn’t be a hard sell.

Now though, it’s like we’re right back to needing another mayor before the Flames commit to anything.
__________________
Mom and Dad love you, Rowan - February 15, 2024
GreenLantern2814 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GreenLantern2814 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-03-2022, 04:31 PM   #1004
badradio
First Line Centre
 
badradio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Exp:
Default

http://https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/calgary-new-arena-deal-terminated-1.6302872

Could probably change the thread title. It’s dead Jim.
badradio is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to badradio For This Useful Post:
Old 01-03-2022, 04:39 PM   #1005
carmenshoes
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Exp:
Default

Flames owners walking away because of an added $12M on a project with a $600M-700M price tag? Sounds like they were looking for any excuse to back out.
carmenshoes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2022, 04:47 PM   #1006
Jay Random
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by carmenshoes View Post
Flames owners walking away because of an added $12M on a project with a $600M-700M price tag? Sounds like they were looking for any excuse to back out.
It wasn't a $600-700m price tag when they signed the deal. As Bingo said upthread:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
The final decision was made in and around the costs that the mayor eluded to, but both sides have been nervous with the rising costs for the past 18 months.

I may make a decision to cut my losses on a 5% move on a stock price, but if I've lost 30% in the last three weeks it's not the 5% that is the killer ... it's the additional 5%.
And if the city was pushing to add $12m on before the first shovel was in the ground, when it was still easy for CSEC to back out, how many more extra costs would they have added once construction began and CSEC had no choice but to comply? Neither side can exactly claim to be operating in good faith here.

__________________
WARNING: The preceding message may not have been processed in a sarcasm-free facility.

Last edited by Jay Random; 01-03-2022 at 07:03 PM.
Jay Random is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jay Random For This Useful Post:
Old 01-03-2022, 04:55 PM   #1007
PuckSlap
Powerplay Quarterback
 
PuckSlap's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Exp:
Default

Black diamond had a nice outdoor rink. Maybe the owners will throw a few more bleachers in and a hotdog vender. I’ll stream the game on my YouTube channel.
PuckSlap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2022, 05:19 PM   #1008
Sec214
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Sep 2020
Exp:
Default

Flames needed a reason to back out and Joyti didn't want to be a scapegoat so she got out in front of it. Kinda pissed of the flames but they knew Joyti isn't the mayor you'll get anything extra from but she maybe the mayor when they revisit the project. Didn't want to burn any bridges.

This is due to inflation costs, not because the deal was sour - they overrun on cost estimates would be astronomical to any quotes to be produced Intime for shovels in the ground.. I know a guy who knows a guy at Orange Julius.
__________________
Sec214 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sec214 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-03-2022, 07:00 PM   #1009
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Obligatory: Mayor = 1 vote.

This deal got passed with an ambivalent mayor.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2022, 07:17 PM   #1010
Ducay
Franchise Player
 
Ducay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
I really don’t see how some sort of compromise cannot be reached on this deal. For what amounts to a year of Blake Coleman, we’re really not getting a new building?
I see you've never dealt with Murray Edwards before

Ducay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2022, 07:19 PM   #1011
Mattman
First Line Centre
 
Mattman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: YYC
Exp:
Default

Sigh..

I don't remember who posted it originally, but it honestly seems like every year there is a problem with this team. Whether it the players, racist coaches, Covid, arena deals, it's like there's always something to bring the mood down.
__________________
Mattman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Mattman For This Useful Post:
Old 01-03-2022, 07:44 PM   #1012
Wormius
Franchise Player
 
Wormius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Somewhere down the crazy river.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mattman View Post
Sigh..

I don't remember who posted it originally, but it honestly seems like every year there is a problem with this team. Whether it the players, racist coaches, Covid, arena deals, it's like there's always something to bring the mood down.

I remember when they let go of a bunch of staff when covid first hit and the CSEC didn’t do anything for them.
Wormius is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2022, 09:55 PM   #1013
Manhattanboy
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wormius View Post
I remember when they let go of a bunch of staff when covid first hit and the CSEC didn’t do anything for them.
We get it. You hate CSEC. You hate Edwards. You hate the other owners.

Why are you a fan of an organization you hate so much?
Manhattanboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2022, 10:09 PM   #1014
Gemnoble
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Gemnoble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2021
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by badradio View Post

Right, I'm out.
Gemnoble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2022, 10:33 PM   #1015
OutOfTheCube
Franchise Player
 
OutOfTheCube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Exp:
Default

It’s weird you guys aren’t kind of more pissed off or something.

You do know that, regardless of what’s said, it’s either a new arena or the team leaves eventually, right? There’s no way the NHL lets a team play in a 40 year old building for long, at least not without a plan in place. There will start to be considerable pressure over the next few years to find a solution, and if that solution isn’t a new arena, well…
OutOfTheCube is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OutOfTheCube For This Useful Post:
Old 01-03-2022, 10:36 PM   #1016
Goriders
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GreenLantern2814 View Post
Fair enough - is that what the Flames said though?

I think everyone would understand pausing the development before construction begins due to pandemic-related supply cost issues. That wouldn’t be a hard sell.

Now though, it’s like we’re right back to needing another mayor before the Flames commit to anything.
Dare to dream.
Goriders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2022, 10:39 PM   #1017
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joborule View Post
Actually though...would Tsuu Tina be interested in having the new arena in their Taza development? Right beside the casino? Wouldn't that be a interesting plot twist!
Taza isn’t really by the Grey Eagle casino and it’s not anywhere near close enough to be like an entertainment district. Is there another casino they are developing that you are referring to.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2022, 10:53 PM   #1018
djsFlames
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Exp:
Default

Greed sucks.

The short term overages to get the thing erected would've paid off long term for both sides.

City deserves better.
djsFlames is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to djsFlames For This Useful Post:
Old 01-03-2022, 11:00 PM   #1019
Reggie Dunlop
All I can get
 
Reggie Dunlop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

The arena deal is as much a real estate development play to CSEC as is the facility itself. See the ICE District in Edmonton. They wouldnt get the same control or return on Tsuutina land.

They'd almost be better off resurrecting Calgary NEXT.

Last edited by Reggie Dunlop; 01-03-2022 at 11:03 PM.
Reggie Dunlop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2022, 11:19 PM   #1020
FanIn80
GOAT!
 
FanIn80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Exp:
Default

Why can't we have a progressive mayor who likes tech industries AND sports?

Edit: I keep forgetting there's a new mayor. Is it a good sign when the new mayor seems exactly like the old one?

Last edited by FanIn80; 01-03-2022 at 11:23 PM.
FanIn80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
e=ng , edmonton is no good


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:36 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021