Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-21-2021, 06:34 PM   #61
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Exp:
Default

Mayor will be live on CTV shortly.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 06:35 PM   #62
the_only_turek_fan
Lifetime Suspension
 
the_only_turek_fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Exp:
Default

I don’t understand why two people can’t get together over a whisky and split the differences. This is so embarrassing.
the_only_turek_fan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to the_only_turek_fan For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 06:35 PM   #63
fulham
Backup Goalie
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Victoria
Exp:
Default

300M and the land for free... Still not enough of a sweetener.

Why dont the flames ownership just tell the truth? And say they will move the team unless they get a 100% tax-payer funded arena.

Anything other than that is semantics and posturing.
fulham is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fulham For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 06:35 PM   #64
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

https://twitter.com/user/status/1473466448643190784

So it’s Gondek trying to change the deal

“The Flames have pulled out of the deal because I changed the deal”

Last edited by ComixZone; 12-21-2021 at 06:37 PM.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 06:37 PM   #65
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Exp:
Default

Photovoltaics are the climate mitigations.

Sounds like they were attached to the approval of the development permit.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 06:37 PM   #66
N-E-B
Franchise Player
 
N-E-B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ComixZone View Post
https://twitter.com/user/status/1473466448643190784

So it’s Gondek trying to change the deal
Flames should sue the city.
N-E-B is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to N-E-B For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 06:37 PM   #67
zamler
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

I must be living under a rock. I didn't know until now what the cacophony surrounding bill 21 was. I don't know what the deal is with "climate mitigation" what is that all about?

I just want to watch hockey and go to games when I can.
Quote:
Originally Posted by DoubleK View Post
Photovoltaics are the climate mitigations.

Sounds like they were attached to the approval of the development permit.
What's wrong with that?
zamler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 06:38 PM   #68
Burning Beard
First Line Centre
 
Burning Beard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2020
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Torture View Post
$100k
Vs
$10M

I don't think that's going to cover it bud.
Cut the condescending attitude. People don't always have to agree with everything you say.
Burning Beard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 06:38 PM   #69
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Default

looks to be city demanding more money

https://twitter.com/user/status/1473466742919745537
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 06:39 PM   #70
Bonded
Franchise Player
 
Bonded's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Exp:
Default

Well there is the Flames side of it. Still feels like nixing the deal was pretty unreasonable at this stage over it. Strong-arm negotiation or Murray telling Gondek to eff off.
Bonded is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 06:41 PM   #71
tkflames
First Line Centre
 
tkflames's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mazrim View Post
So why is it a problem for the City to come forward with some changes? The City cooperated with CSEC when they wanted to punt CMLC as project managers, and they changed other things in the agreement in July. Things can change even during construction and that isn't unusual. These aren't critical changes to the project by the sounds and money costs of it, either.
Because there is a deal in place that already clarifies how these costs are addressed. See Pikes tweet as a starting point...
__________________
Go Flames Go
tkflames is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 06:41 PM   #72
DoubleK
Franchise Player
 
DoubleK's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
Exp:
Default

CMLC is going to be put back in charge.

That's my take.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
DoubleK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 06:41 PM   #73
Sidney Crosby's Hat
Franchise Player
 
Sidney Crosby's Hat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Exp:
Default

Oilers, according to Forbes, are worth $1.1 billion. Flames are worth $680 million in a bigger market. Flames with a new arena would likely be worth close to $1.2 billion. So this is Edwards pissing away almost $600 million in franchise value over $9 million if you believe all this at face value (I don’t).
Sidney Crosby's Hat is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Sidney Crosby's Hat For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 06:41 PM   #74
Minnie
Franchise Player
 
Minnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: On your last nerve...:D
Exp:
Default

Good riddance. *shrug*
Minnie is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Minnie For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 06:42 PM   #75
ComixZone
Franchise Player
 
ComixZone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bonded View Post
Well there is the Flames side of it. Still feels like nixing the deal was pretty unreasonable at this stage over it. Strong-arm negotiation or Murray telling Gondek to eff off.
When your partner is doing business in bad faith (changing the deal at the 11th hour), you shouldn’t be in business with that partner.

Gondek then coming out and saying the Flames are pulling out of the deal while she changes what that deal is reeks of politician garbage.
ComixZone is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to ComixZone For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 06:42 PM   #76
calgarywinning
First Line Centre
 
calgarywinning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Field near Field, AB
Exp:
Default

Gondek, making sure no arena for Calgarians, one aspect is climate add ons by the city. Trudeau is pleased.
calgarywinning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 06:42 PM   #77
MegaErtz
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Exp:
Default

There shouldn't be any public money going to this project. Taxpayers should have had time to review the proposal before their elected representatives, most of whom are no longer on council and never had to defend their vote to the public, voted to give the Flames hundreds of millions of dollars of public funds.
MegaErtz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 06:42 PM   #78
Minnie
Franchise Player
 
Minnie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: On your last nerve...:D
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarywinning View Post
Gondek, making sure no arena for Calgarians, one aspect is climate add ons by the city. Trudeau is pleased.
*eyeroll*
Minnie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-21-2021, 06:42 PM   #79
Royle9
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Changing the deal and then blaming the Flames?
I get Murray is a bit of a Tool at times but this is specifically Gondek/City changing the agreed deal and then pushing it off as CSECs fault… sad.
Royle9 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Royle9 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-21-2021, 06:43 PM   #80
Ozy_Flame

Posted the 6 millionth post!
 
Ozy_Flame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Exp:
Default

At this point, I'm on the City's side. They have been more than generous in providing funds, assets, and overrun costs from the taxpayer dime (over $300M). CSEC already moved to change the deal in July, and the City agreed to share cost overruns. If any issues with infrastructure come along in a complex project like this - not to mention the larger master plan considerations, then it's the City that has to bring it up and be blamed as the "bad guy" as I'm sure is CSEC is going to position them - once again. Effectively they want the city to cover more and more of the project - more creeping costs for the taxpayer.

The Flames are awesome, but Murray Edwards and CSEC can go pound sand.
Ozy_Flame is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 9 Users Say Thank You to Ozy_Flame For This Useful Post:
Reply

Tags
e=ng , edmonton is no good


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:29 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021