What is more accurate CON indicator?

[Quigz17]

Is it in the Client program itself or through the Player Ratings page here on the site?

Pretty big disparity between the two on Jack Johnson right now, not sure to start him or not.

[Cheese]

The simulator or GM editor always trumps, although I'm surprised the ratings page doesn't match.. It should.

[Quigz17]

Yeah, it's weird. Johnson is injured on the ratings page, but good to go in the editor. Also, Halak has been at 98 in the editor for almost a week despite not starting since Jan. 20. He's 100 on the ratings page.

Originally Posted by Cheese

The simulator or GM editor always trumps, although I'm surprised the ratings page doesn't match.. It should.

[Jiri Hrdina]

Can you provide the link to the page you are seeing. It sounds old

[Quigz17]

http://cphlsim.com/player-ratings/

But that's the thing, the GM Editor is what seems out of whack because there's no way Halak should be at 98 all week. And Johnson was listed as getting injured last game. That's both reflected there, but not in the Editor.

[Quigz17]

Yeah, OK, I downloaded the roster file again and apparently mine was out of date, I guess. That's the first time I didn't get a notification about that upon start-up of the Editor though. It was letting me edit my lines as usual.