10-10-2020, 06:53 PM
|
#22
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cali Panthers Fan
I have a suspicion that Ryan Pulock (Isles), MacKenzie Weegar (Panthers), and Jake Virtanen (Canucks) will be traded after the arbitrator rules or they sign their deal. I think the player no longer fits the team's plans long term and they won't want to pay those dollars.
|
Pulock was the Isles #1 Dman this year. More likely they extend him long term IMO.
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 06:56 PM
|
#23
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Boca Raton, FL
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Roof-Daddy
Pulock was the Isles #1 Dman this year. More likely they extend him long term IMO.
|
Maybe. Like I said it was a hunch. They have some good young d-men ready to step in, so if the awarded salary is too high, I could see them moving him.
Again, nothing other than a hunch I have.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by ResAlien
If we can't fall in love with replaceable bottom 6 players then the terrorists have won.
|
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 06:57 PM
|
#24
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Royal
Then I don't agree. Too much risk. You don't give out long-term deals based on 1 decent season.
|
I agree with you to an extent. It worked out pretty well with Andersson. I think Mangiapane has the potential to out-perform a decently priced long-term deal
How long until Mangiapane is a UFA?
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 07:05 PM
|
#25
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kidder
I did hear on TSN that the arbitrators will not take into account lost revenue from Covid or anything like that on their rulings.
|
Which should be the right thing to do, given that escrow would technically already account for it.
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 07:07 PM
|
#26
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wood
I agree with you to an extent. It worked out pretty well with Andersson. I think Mangiapane has the potential to out-perform a decently priced long-term deal
How long until Mangiapane is a UFA?
|
3 years. I think 2x2.5 would be ideal. If he proves he is a top 6 forward, then you give him 4-5 years.
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 07:14 PM
|
#27
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Royal
Then I don't agree. Too much risk. You don't give out long-term deals based on 1 decent season.
|
There is risk both ways. Last year we asked him to show and prove rather than giving him say a 3-year deal and it looks like it's going to bite us in the butt. We just lost out on a couple bargain years when we probably could have locked him up for under 2 million. If we do the same thing again, and he produces were in the same boat. It's a tough call. It can go both ways. He had 17 goals this year in a shortened season with no power play goals. This was his first full season. It is early to say exactly what he is but like I said there is risk both ways.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Hackey For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-10-2020, 07:17 PM
|
#28
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Royal
Then I don't agree. Too much risk. You don't give out long-term deals based on 1 decent season.
|
Signing a young player to a long term deal is the kind of high variance move that the team should take. You just need to bet on the right player.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-10-2020, 07:19 PM
|
#29
|
First Line Centre
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Royal
3 years. I think 2x2.5 would be ideal. If he proves he is a top 6 forward, then you give him 4-5 years.
|
Yeah I hope for the same, I'd like to see more from Mangiapane
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 07:21 PM
|
#30
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Indiana
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
Signing a young player to a long term deal is the kind of high variance move that the team should take. You just need to bet on the right player.
|
Roman Josi’s previous contract is a good example of this. It ended up being the best contracts of the 2010s for someone who was not a top draft pick.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to 1qqaaz For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-10-2020, 07:25 PM
|
#31
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
Signing a young player to a long term deal is the kind of high variance move that the team should take. You just need to bet on the right player.
|
And I don't think Mangiapane is the guy to do that with. How many times have we seen guys play with Backlund and then never reach those heights again? Mangiapane has never produced without top 6 forwards on his line.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Crown Royal For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-10-2020, 07:32 PM
|
#32
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Royal
And I don't think Mangiapane is the guy to do that with. How many times have we seen guys play with Backlund and then never reach those heights again? Mangiapane has never produced without top 6 forwards on his line.
|
He scored a ton in the AHL. I don’t believe he’s Backlund dependent and IMO his NHL career is too short to make that conclusion.
I’d bet on him.
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 07:39 PM
|
#33
|
Franchise Player
|
With 17 goals and top six minutes played I can see an Arb giving Andrew $3+ m
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 07:46 PM
|
#34
|
Lifetime Suspension
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Strange Brew
He scored a ton in the AHL. I don’t believe he’s Backlund dependent and IMO his NHL career is too short to make that conclusion.
I’d bet on him.
|
Lots of players score a ton in the AHL
I'm not making a conclusion, I am saying that increases the risk that he might not be the player we think and thus I wouldn't give him a long term contract yet. I have no problem with gambling on Andersson, if Valimaki has a strong year, I'd be willing to gamble on him too. Mangiapane has enough flaws in his game and doesn't project to be a star, so I wouldn't take the risk, that's how you get a Viktor Rask contract
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 08:00 PM
|
#35
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Royal
Lots of players score a ton in the AHL
I'm not making a conclusion, I am saying that increases the risk that he might not be the player we think and thus I wouldn't give him a long term contract yet. I have no problem with gambling on Andersson, if Valimaki has a strong year, I'd be willing to gamble on him too. Mangiapane has enough flaws in his game and doesn't project to be a star, so I wouldn't take the risk, that's how you get a Viktor Rask contract
|
I think Mangiapane was scoring alright in a 4th line role before Backlund. In addition his line was pushing play and had amazing advanced stats over the last two seasons. Also, if I am not mistaken most of Mangiapane's offense came at 5 on 5 which was a huge bonus for the team. I think he can be even more of a factor with an increased roll and more PP time.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gvitaly For This Useful Post:
|
|
10-10-2020, 08:06 PM
|
#36
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by gvitaly
I think Mangiapane was scoring alright in a 4th line role before Backlund. In addition his line was pushing play and had amazing advanced stats over the last two seasons. Also, if I am not mistaken most of Mangiapane's offense came at 5 on 5 which was a huge bonus for the team. I think he can be even more of a factor with an increased roll and more PP time.
|
Mangiapane was playing well on a line with Ryan and Lucic before he was promoted to 3M when Frolik was failing.
Ryan kind of lost his line after that and never found a new one and seems like the odd man out now.
But if they do plan to play cheap youngsters on the 4th line, there’s no better vet than Ryan to put them with.
I’d even consider moving Ryan up with Monahan and Gaudreau and moving Lindholm to centre Tkachuk and have Backlund and Mangiapane form their own line. This would really spread out the scoring and mitigate any weaknesses in the 11th and 12th forwards.
__________________
Calgary Flames, PLEASE GO TO THE NET! AND SHOOT THE PUCK! GENERATING OFFENSE IS NOT DIFFICULT! SKATE HARD, SHOOT HARD, CRASH THE NET HARD!
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 08:07 PM
|
#37
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Royal
3 years. I think 2x2.5 would be ideal. If he proves he is a top 6 forward, then you give him 4-5 years.
|
If he would sign for 2x2.25 it would have been done.
He wouldn’t sign a 1 yeR deal for that.
It will start with a 3.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 08:07 PM
|
#38
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crown Royal
Lots of players score a ton in the AHL
I'm not making a conclusion, I am saying that increases the risk that he might not be the player we think and thus I wouldn't give him a long term contract yet. I have no problem with gambling on Andersson, if Valimaki has a strong year, I'd be willing to gamble on him too. Mangiapane has enough flaws in his game and doesn't project to be a star, so I wouldn't take the risk, that's how you get a Viktor Rask contract
|
Rask is an interesting comparison. Mangiapane has outperformed him in both the NHL and AHL and has shown the progression you want to see. Lock him up.
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 08:14 PM
|
#39
|
Franchise Player
|
How about 8 x 2.75 or something. Guarantee him a lifetime of money and absorb the risk that he doesn’t pan out.
|
|
|
10-10-2020, 08:17 PM
|
#40
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Mangiapane was playing well on a line with Ryan and Lucic before he was promoted to 3M when Frolik was failing.
Ryan kind of lost his line after that and never found a new one and seems like the odd man out now.
But if they do plan to play cheap youngsters on the 4th line, there’s no better vet than Ryan to put them with.
I’d even consider moving Ryan up with Monahan and Gaudreau and moving Lindholm to centre Tkachuk and have Backlund and Mangiapane form their own line. This would really spread out the scoring and mitigate any weaknesses in the 11th and 12th forwards.
|
I meant when he played with Ryan and Hathaway, they also had good success as a line. Over the last two seasons, Mangiapane seemed to make whichever line he was on better.
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:58 PM.
|
|