Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-01-2018, 03:28 PM   #61
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

Favorites:
Tampa
Toronto
Nashville
Winnipeg
Columbus

Contenders
Colorado
Boston
Washington
Calgary
Carolina
Pittsburgh
San jose
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 03:56 PM   #62
Macindoc
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
Favorites:
Tampa
Toronto
Nashville
Winnipeg
Columbus

Contenders
Colorado
Boston
Washington
Calgary
Carolina
Pittsburgh
San jose
You have Columbus as a favourite?
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 04:01 PM   #63
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

I think Buffalo is at least in the second grouping.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 04:05 PM   #64
Macindoc
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

And you could argue for Colorado to be in the first.
Macindoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-01-2018, 04:24 PM   #65
カナダ人です
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
Favorites:
Tampa
Toronto
Nashville
Winnipeg
Columbus

Contenders
Colorado
Boston
Washington
Calgary
Carolina
Pittsburgh
San jose
So what you're saying is, any team that makes the playoffs could win the Stanley Cup?
カナダ人です is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to カナダ人です For This Useful Post:
Old 12-01-2018, 04:25 PM   #66
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SW Calgary
Exp:
Default

I'd agree with maybe them being in that second group of teams with the likes of Boston, Colorado, Colombus. Not a favourite by any means but a WCF appearance isn't a stretch

Last edited by btimbit; 12-01-2018 at 06:34 PM.
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2018, 11:57 AM   #67
GullFoss
#1 Goaltender
 
GullFoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macindoc View Post
You have Columbus as a favourite?
I do. Very underrated defense group (arguably top 5 in the league), a top 10 game breaker, the best goalie in the world and a very strong 1,3, 4 forward lines. The only real knock on the team is that they're missing a second high quality centre to compliment dubois.

All in all that's a real good recipe to take a trip to the finals. If Bob gets hot - he's almost unstoppable with that defensive group in front of him. And then add to that a first line that can break open games and a third and fourth line that can provide depth scoring.
GullFoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GullFoss For This Useful Post:
Old 12-02-2018, 12:02 PM   #68
GordonBlue
Franchise Player
 
GordonBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by keenan87 View Post
I think this year it would be nice to see them comfortably make the playoffs and win 1-2 rounds. In the off-season, it would be nice if they can a goalie (dont fully trust Rittich yet) and another top 6/9 player.

Sign one of Bobrovsky, Varlamov, or Talbot

Sign one of Eberle or Hayes

Trade Frolik and Stone for picks

2019-2020
Gaudreau-Lindholm-Neal
Tkachuk-Monahan-Eberle/Hayes
Bennett-Backlund-Ryan
Dube-Jankowski-Mangiapane

Brodie-Giordano
Hanifin-Valimaki
Andersson-Hamonic
Kylington

Talbot/Bob/Varlamov
Rittich

...Then if Neal doesn't do well, hope he gets picked up by Seattle
Lol. Talbot. You're better off with what you have.
And Eberle? You want a one dimensional defensively weak winger who disappear s in crunch time?
GordonBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2018, 12:12 PM   #69
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by GullFoss View Post
I do. Very underrated defense group (arguably top 5 in the league), a top 10 game breaker, the best goalie in the world and a very strong 1,3, 4 forward lines. The only real knock on the team is that they're missing a second high quality centre to compliment dubois.

All in all that's a real good recipe to take a trip to the finals. If Bob gets hot - he's almost unstoppable with that defensive group in front of him. And then add to that a first line that can break open games and a third and fourth line that can provide depth scoring.
I agree. I think Columbus is the sleeper of the Eastern conference
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2018, 12:44 PM   #70
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Teams in the standings vs their underlying numbers ...

Buffalo, Washington and Toronto as pretenders?

Philly, Jersey, Pittsburgh and Carolina as ripped off?

Flames who they are.

Code:
Team	Rk	Stats	Diff
Philadelphia Flyers	27	7	20
New Jersey Devils	29	10	19
Pittsburgh Penguins	26	9	17
Carolina Hurricanes	20	4	16
San Jose Sharks	17	2	15
Los Angeles Kings	31	17	14
Vegas Golden Knights	14	1	13
Florida Panthers	25	12	13
Minnesota Wild	13	5	8
Montreal Canadiens	16	8	8
St Louis Blues	30	22	8
Chicago Blackhawks	28	21	7
Arizona Coyotes	23	20	3
Calgary Flames	7	6	1
Edmonton Oilers	18	19	-1
Tampa Bay Lightning	1	3	-2
Boston Bruins	10	13	-3
Winnipeg Jets	9	14	-5
New York Rangers	19	25	-6
Detroit Red Wings	21	27	-6
Vancouver Canucks	24	30	-6
Columbus Blue Jackets	8	15	-7
Ottawa Senators	22	29	-7
Nashville Predators	3	11	-8
Colorado Avalanche	5	16	-11
Dallas Stars	11	23	-12
New York Islanders	15	28	-13
Toronto Maple Leafs	2	18	-16
Washington Capitals	6	24	-18
Anaheim Ducks	12	31	-19
Buffalo Sabres	4	26	-22
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2018, 12:46 PM   #71
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

^ which numbers are used for ‘stats’?
DeluxeMoustache is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2018, 12:52 PM   #72
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Stats leaders:

1) Vegas
2) San Jose
3) Tampa (sure)
4) Carolina
5) Minnesota
6) Calgary
7) Philadelphia
8) Montreal
9) Pittsburgh
10) New Jersey

Hard to buy what that is selling
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Enoch Root For This Useful Post:
Old 12-02-2018, 01:23 PM   #73
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Stats leaders:

1) Vegas
2) San Jose
3) Tampa (sure)
4) Carolina
5) Minnesota
6) Calgary
7) Philadelphia
8) Montreal
9) Pittsburgh
10) New Jersey

Hard to buy what that is selling
You think?

Vegas, SJ, Tampa, Carolina, Minny, Pittsburgh are known to be good two way teams. Montreal got off to a good start, Philly has goaltending woes but playing better than their record dictates.

I do a combined stats ranking ... average of the "for" categories with the average for the "vs" categories.

Gets away from focusing too much on say just CF% and not enough on scoring chances etc.
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2018, 01:50 PM   #74
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bingo View Post
You think?

Vegas, SJ, Tampa, Carolina, Minny, Pittsburgh are known to be good two way teams. Montreal got off to a good start, Philly has goaltending woes but playing better than their record dictates.

I do a combined stats ranking ... average of the "for" categories with the average for the "vs" categories.

Gets away from focusing too much on say just CF% and not enough on scoring chances etc.
Yes I think.

How can you look at that list and conclude that the stats you are considering is doing a good job of representing who the best teams are?
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2018, 02:04 PM   #75
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Las Vegas was a cup finalist. SJ and Tampa preseason favourites. Penguins have two recent cups. Carolina in everyone’s list for pushing the play. Calgary clearly playing well.

Thats 6 of 10

.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2018, 02:15 PM   #76
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

you're counting Carolina, who are stats darlings but aren't very good. That's a circular argument.

Vegas hasn't been one of the best teams in the league this year (yet). Neither have the Pens. And SJ has been maybe in the 10-15 range, but not elite (ranked 2nd).

I think most people would agree that the best teams this year (so far) have been:

NAS
TB
TOR
COL
WAS
WPG
then maybe
BUF
CAL
MIN
BOS

Two of the top 3, and 5 of the top 6 missing.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2018, 02:52 PM   #77
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Not sure I agree. Toronto has leaky defence an amazing goaltending so they be up a list of the standings but not necessarily up the list and how they’re playing

Vegas almost the complete opposite where they were playing well but we’re not getting the goaltending

Nashville and Winnipeg or both teams that are doing not quite as well as expected but are still playing well so there are non-issues in terms of differentials

The whole point of having a statistics ranking versus the standings ranking isn’t that they should mirror each other 100%. It’s about pointing out teams that seem to have numbers that suggest they are playing either better or worse than they should


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2018, 02:54 PM   #78
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Vancouver and the Islanders with the two teams early if that had good records but we’re playing pretty putrid. Buffaloes joined that list of late. the oilers certainly are getting better results than they should of late


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Bingo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2018, 02:58 PM   #79
Enoch Root
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: May 2012
Exp:
Default

Of course they shouldn't agree 100%.

But if you looking at the standings as one suggestive list, and the stats as another, the stats list is not close to doing as good of a job of suggesting which have been the best teams this year.

And say what you want about Toronto and Nashville, but you aren't going to get much support if you try to claim they haven't been among the top 5 teams so far this year.

Vegas has been good since Calgary blew them out, but they weren't playing very well before that. You're talking your position here, IMO.
Enoch Root is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-02-2018, 03:02 PM   #80
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Enoch Root View Post
Vegas has been good since Calgary blew them out, but they weren't playing very well before that. You're talking your position here, IMO.
They sure crapped the bed last night. They should be ashamed of themselves.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:06 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021