Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10-23-2017, 10:23 AM   #1
OMG!WTF!
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Exp:
Default Condo Law and other Nonsense

Sorry if this has been covered in some other thread. My search skills suck. I'd rather just add this to an existing thread than start a new one. However...

I understand a bit about condo law, enough to never want to own one. Once bylaws are registered and enforceable, if a fine is levied against someone, it is task of the board to collect the fine. So if they want to get paid they have to initiate the legal action.

The question I have is what does the condo board have to provide as evidence of an infraction? It seems like you can just call, complain, and the person gets a fine. Can a board win a case involving a bylaw infraction and consequently enforce a penalty or fine with absolutely no evidence other than people saying, for example, a certain dog is barking? There's no photos or videos or recordings or anything. Just one word against the other. Seems like a patently unwinable issue for the board yet they seem to go this route quite often.

Any other complaints about condo boards? Maybe this could be a mega thread some day.
OMG!WTF! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2017, 10:38 AM   #2
CaptainYooh
Franchise Player
 
CaptainYooh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG!WTF! View Post
...
Any other complaints about condo boards? Maybe this could be a mega thread some day.
LOL
This WILL be a mega-thread. Nothing more satisfying than bitching in a forum off-topic thread about anything and everything... Three main issues in any condominium corporation are People, Parking and Pets, or so called PPP. There is always plenty of reasons to complain about each one of those.

Condominium Corporation has the power to collect through a normal legal action and, if successful, register a caveat against a unit in a CondoCorp to collect unpaid condominium fees. Court costs, collection costs and other damages are all collectable against the value of a unit. In other words, the owner may have issues with his/her lender, if there's a mortgage. Ultimately, the amount would be collected upon sale (or forced sale).

As for the reasons - the CondoCorp must have a valid reason in law to assess a charge against an owner. It can't just say this person is noisy/stinky/whatever and we want to charge him $1,000. It has to prove damages caused to the common property, for example, to prove the case etc. There are also various infractions noted in Condominium By-Laws, Resolutions and Special Resolutions, which specify fines. Those could be grey areas, as some of them could be found unlawful by courts, if challenged.
__________________
"An idea is always a generalization, and generalization is a property of thinking. To generalize means to think." Georg Hegel
“To generalize is to be an idiot.” William Blake

Last edited by CaptainYooh; 10-23-2017 at 10:42 AM.
CaptainYooh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2017, 10:45 AM   #3
OMG!WTF!
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Exp:
Default

Oh ok. So they can't really collect a punitive fine? Like your dog barked, pay $250? The fine has to be attached to actual costs?

If the damages are simply noise complaints, could the fine be enforced if there are recordings of the noise, police reports etc? I've got a buddy of course who has a $500 fine for unconfirmed and unrecorded dog barking reports.
OMG!WTF! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2017, 10:51 AM   #4
CaptainYooh
Franchise Player
 
CaptainYooh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Noise complaint is no different than any other nuisance complaint, really. Say, there is a Resolution approving a $1,000 fine for excessive noise after 10 pm. It would be very difficult, if not impossible, to prove validity of this fine in court, because it goes against a municipal policy. At the same time, condo owners have right to quiet enjoyment of their property, so, if someone listens to death metal all day long at 60dB, they would have a case. The point is, it's all relative and dependent on the actual circumstances.
__________________
"An idea is always a generalization, and generalization is a property of thinking. To generalize means to think." Georg Hegel
“To generalize is to be an idiot.” William Blake
CaptainYooh is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CaptainYooh For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2017, 10:52 AM   #5
calf
broke the first rule
 
calf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OMG!WTF! View Post
Oh ok. So they can't really collect a punitive fine? Like your dog barked, pay $250? The fine has to be attached to actual costs?

If the damages are simply noise complaints, could the fine be enforced if there are recordings of the noise, police reports etc? I've got a buddy of course who has a $500 fine for unconfirmed and unrecorded dog barking reports.
Depends - if the condo bylaws say "noise complaints will be assessed a $250 fine", then it's enforceable. But there needs to be backup. At my condo, a fine is assessed if there are multiple reports from multiple people. A one-off, or if only one person complains, then it becomes a he-said/she-said situation, and nothing can really be proven or done.
calf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2017, 10:52 AM   #6
troutman
Unfrozen Caveman Lawyer
 
troutman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Winebar Kensington
Exp:
Default

https://www.cmhc-schl.gc.ca/en/co/bu...obugu_007a.cfm

Can a condominium corporation place a lien on an individual unit?

In Alberta, a condominium corporation can file a “caveat” with the Land Titles Office against an owner's unit for unpaid contributions. A caveat is a warning that another party is claiming interest in the property. Once the corporation receives payment from an owner for the outstanding contribution, it must withdraw the caveat.

A corporation may charge interest on any unpaid balance and has the right to recover from owners all reasonable costs, including interest and legal expenses incurred by the corporation in collecting the amount owing, as well as the cost of registering, enforcing and discharging a caveat.


https://www.condolawalberta.ca/finan...contributions/
If you have a mortgage, [condo board could] ask your mortgage company to pay the outstanding amount (note: many banks consider failure to pay condo contributions as an act of default that could result in foreclosure);
__________________
https://www.mergenlaw.com/
http://cjsw.com/program/fossil-records/
twitter/instagram @troutman1966

Last edited by troutman; 10-23-2017 at 10:54 AM.
troutman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2017, 10:53 AM   #7
dubc80
Powerplay Quarterback
 
dubc80's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Behind enemy lines!
Exp:
Default

Condo boards usually ask for proof (pictures, videos, statements) to accompany complaints.

They'll probably give a couple warnings before issuing a fine.
dubc80 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2017, 10:58 AM   #8
Regular_John
First Line Centre
 
Regular_John's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

It varies by complex, but in reality the fine schedule should be the last resort for any board when it comes to infractions.

In the example of a dog barking and disturbing the peace, the board's goal isn't to levy a $250 fine to an owner, it's to get the dog to stop barking.

In a well run complex the board would have a documented history of complaints, warnings delivered to the owner and a history of attempts to resolve the issue before it got to the point of a fine. If the owner just straight up refuses to pay the board could put a levy on the unit which would need to be cleared as a condition of sale.

Should it ever reach the point of getting before a judge it's essentially the board VS the owner, and a good board has the documentation to back them, including a copy of the bylaws which the owner accepted by continuing to own/reside in their unit.

Tl;dr: There's many layers to condo by laws and fines that can be levied. There's much more to it than "dog barked, you owe $250"
Regular_John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-23-2017, 03:21 PM   #9
GordonBlue
Franchise Player
 
GordonBlue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Alberta
Exp:
Default

When I owned a condo, at one point I joined the board. People often refused to pay fines as we often couldn't prove anything. What we ended up doing to was to purchase cameras. Took less than two years for the cameras to pay for themselves, and the time saved was enormous.

made collecting fines so much easier, and way less fighting to collect.

us: "you dumped a couch outside the garbage bin."
them: "no I didn't"
us: "here's the time stamped picture and video."
GordonBlue is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to GordonBlue For This Useful Post:
Old 10-23-2017, 04:03 PM   #10
bomba
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

The bylaws are set by individual Condo Corps and are different from property to property. These bylaws can be amended by the Condo Corp and are subject to change.

Generally speaking, most Condo Corps use a property manager who is responsible for the enforcement and collection of fees related to bylaw infractions.

Agree with the last comment about security cameras as a good way to document incidents.
bomba is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:12 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021