Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

View Poll Results: Best guess for Tkachuk's contract result
8 @ 7M 10 1.61%
8 @ 8M 41 6.59%
8 @ 9M 21 3.38%
8 @ 10M 8 1.29%
7 @ 7M 21 3.38%
7 @ 8M 61 9.81%
7 @ 9M 19 3.05%
7 @ 10M 3 0.48%
6 @ 6M 4 0.64%
6 @ 7M 48 7.72%
6 @ 8M 126 20.26%
6 @ 9M 27 4.34%
5 @ 6M 3 0.48%
5 @ 7M 56 9.00%
5 @ 8M 66 10.61%
5 @ 9M 10 1.61%
4 @ 5M 1 0.16%
4 @ 6M 4 0.64%
4 @ 7M 19 3.05%
3 @ 4M 2 0.32%
3 @ 5M 4 0.64%
3 @ 6M 46 7.40%
2 @ 4M 3 0.48%
2 @ 5M 15 2.41%
1 @ 4M 1 0.16%
1 @ 5M 3 0.48%
Voters: 622. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 05-28-2019, 06:33 PM   #141
JTech780
Powerplay Quarterback
 
JTech780's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Exp:
Default

Let's not forget as well that Tkachuk is only 21, he will be getting paid for what he potentially can be going forward as much as what he has accomplished so far.

In his age group (U22) only McDavid, Marner and Aho put up more points than Tkachuk, and Tkachuk played in a more limited role offensively than those 3.

While yes he has only put up big point totals once, at 21 years old there is every indication that he can continue to do that as well as improve as goes into his prime offensive years.
JTech780 is offline  
Old 05-28-2019, 07:22 PM   #142
kukkudo
#1 Goaltender
 
kukkudo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

I think he is looking at the Matthews deal for term. I'm going with 6.5-7M 5 years
kukkudo is offline  
Old 05-28-2019, 08:41 PM   #143
chedder
#1 Goaltender
 
chedder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kukkudo View Post
I think he is looking at the Matthews deal for term. I'm going with 6.5-7M 5 years
Would 5 years take him straight to free agency? He would have 7 years in the league. If so, why would the Flames do that? Good chance that he's off to the good 'ole USA at that point.
chedder is online now  
Old 05-28-2019, 08:46 PM   #144
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chedder View Post
Would 5 years take him straight to free agency? He would have 7 years in the league. If so, why would the Flames do that? Good chance that he's off to the good 'ole USA at that point.
Because it aligns with Monahan/Gaudreau contracts. It gives us more cap space in a window of those 3 players prime years (as well as signed players such as: Gio, Backlund, Neal, Hamonic(likely)). You can build around that and I don’t see it being detrimental to the future of the organization. You just plan accordingly ahead of time.
Scroopy Noopers is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
Old 05-28-2019, 08:52 PM   #145
chedder
#1 Goaltender
 
chedder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
Because it aligns with Monahan/Gaudreau contracts. It gives us more cap space in a window of those 3 players prime years (as well as signed players such as: Gio, Backlund, Neal, Hamonic(likely)). You can build around that and I don’t see it being detrimental to the future of the organization. You just plan accordingly ahead of time.
If that's the case then sign him for 3 or 4 so you have a chance at re-signing him as a restricted free agent. Johnny only has 3 years left so that's our window.
chedder is online now  
The Following User Says Thank You to chedder For This Useful Post:
Old 05-28-2019, 08:58 PM   #146
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by chedder View Post
If that's the case then sign him for 3 or 4 so you have a chance at re-signing him as a restricted free agent. Johnny only has 3 years left so that's our window.
I’d take that for sure. So 5 years looks even better then as it’s Gaudreau protection once he’s gone. It’s a no brainer in my opinion (because I would suspect Tkachuk would be more willing to sign a 5yr than a 3yr).
Scroopy Noopers is offline  
Old 05-28-2019, 09:13 PM   #147
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scroopy Noopers View Post
He sits. Which I think is inevitable.

Again, show me a comparable that gets a RFA like Tkachuk the same percentage of the cap that Johnny got. If he’s demanding more than that, it isn’t much different than someone asking for $500k over market price on their house because it has more character.


Huge difference.

You ask for more than your house is worth, the buyer moves on to the next one.

Calgary can’t move on to a comparable player.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The Cobra is offline  
Old 05-28-2019, 09:18 PM   #148
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Cobra View Post
Huge difference.

You ask for more than your house is worth, the buyer moves on to the next one.

Calgary can’t move on to a comparable player.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
And he doesn’t get to just freely go to another team.
Scroopy Noopers is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Scroopy Noopers For This Useful Post:
Old 05-28-2019, 10:36 PM   #149
Strange Brew
Franchise Player
 
Strange Brew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Exp:
Default

This is not a exactly free market scenario so the comparisons just don’t work. Both sides have options though, and seems to me in the NHL that the RFA players are doing pretty well for themselves lately.
Strange Brew is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Strange Brew For This Useful Post:
Old 05-28-2019, 10:59 PM   #150
Freeway
Franchise Player
 
Freeway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Remember this: Gaudreau could not be offer-sheeted. Treliving had a number he wanted to pay, and could just wait Gaudreau out. He can't do that with Tkachuk, for many reasons.
__________________
PHWA Member // Managing Editor @ FlamesNation // Author of "On The Clock: Behind The Scenes with the Calgary Flames at the NHL Draft" // Twitter

"Does a great job covering the Flames" - Elliotte Friedman
Freeway is offline  
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Freeway For This Useful Post:
Old 05-28-2019, 11:19 PM   #151
Macindoc
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeway View Post
Remember this: Gaudreau could not be offer-sheeted. Treliving had a number he wanted to pay, and could just wait Gaudreau out. He can't do that with Tkachuk, for many reasons.
Nobody is going to offer him more than he's worth AND give up draft picks, when there are so many quality UFA forwards that will be available this summer for the cost of the contract alone (would you pay him 8.5M AND give up your next four 1st round picks?). If he is offer sheeted, I'm sure the Flames will be happy to match if the offer is in the region of 7-8M for 7 years, or to accept the four 1sts if the offer is 9M+ as some have suggested.
Macindoc is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to Macindoc For This Useful Post:
Old 05-28-2019, 11:26 PM   #152
TheScorpion
First round-bust
 
TheScorpion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: speculating about AHL players
Exp:
Default

^ Still, it's an important point by Freeway. With Tkachuk, the very threat of an offer sheet is a legitimate concern, even if it may seem unrealistic. With Gaudreau, that was completely off the table from the get-go.

Tkachuk's camp has considerable leverage, far more than Gaudreau did.
__________________
"This has been TheScorpion's shtick for years. All these hot takes, clickbait nonsense just to feed his social media algorithms." –Tuco

TheScorpion is offline  
Old 05-29-2019, 04:59 AM   #153
The Cobra
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Macindoc View Post
Nobody is going to offer him more than he's worth AND give up draft picks, when there are so many quality UFA forwards that will be available this summer for the cost of the contract alone (would you pay him 8.5M AND give up your next four 1st round picks?). If he is offer sheeted, I'm sure the Flames will be happy to match if the offer is in the region of 7-8M for 7 years, or to accept the four 1sts if the offer is 9M+ as some have suggested.


Calgary getting 4 likely late 1st round picks and losing a great young player will hurt their SC chances during their likely window.

It sounds great in theory, but Calgary does understand they can’t simply sit back and wait him out. They have a window, and the failure to get him signed shortens that window.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
The Cobra is offline  
Old 05-29-2019, 06:21 AM   #154
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

So offer sheets are rare already, and in this case why can’t we recognize they are pretty darn unlikely?

The offer sheeting team would basically need to have 4 first round picks, for starters

https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/...angers-gorton/

Avs, Rangers, Kings, Ducks, Sabres each have 2. They would need to do some manoeuvring involving picks for this year and next before even being able to offer sheet.

Then they also would need to have the cap space to add that player.

Now you’d have to be nuts to think the Rangers or Avs throw away the number 2 or 4 overall picks as well as 3 other first rounders for frickin’ Tkachuk. He is good but give your head a shake if you think he is that good. Really.

He is also not even the best RFA out there. Marner, Point, and Raantanen are better and Aho
is at least comparable.

Yeah, I don’t even know why people are talking as though an offer sheet for Tkachuk is a realistic factor here
DeluxeMoustache is offline  
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DeluxeMoustache For This Useful Post:
Old 05-29-2019, 06:21 AM   #155
Yoho
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: North America
Exp:
Default

So if Tkachuk gets offer sheeted for only 5 year term does Calgary only have the option to match and accept that term or he walks and we get a small compensation?
Yoho is offline  
Old 05-29-2019, 06:30 AM   #156
DeluxeMoustache
 
DeluxeMoustache's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Freeway View Post
Remember this: Gaudreau could not be offer-sheeted. Treliving had a number he wanted to pay, and could just wait Gaudreau out. He can't do that with Tkachuk, for many reasons.
What are the ‘many reasons’?

If you are going to pretend an offer sheet is a realistic possibility, go ahead and identify a candidate team (has or could make moves to have compensatory pucks, has the cap space, and the need) and then a justification (ex why would the Rangers if they had space give up the second overall, plus 3 more first rounders for Tkachuk?)

I am in no way convinced that an offer sheet is at all a realistic threat or leverage point for Tkachuk.
DeluxeMoustache is offline  
Old 05-29-2019, 06:46 AM   #157
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yoho View Post
So if Tkachuk gets offer sheeted for only 5 year term does Calgary only have the option to match and accept that term or he walks and we get a small compensation?
If he signs that offer sheet Calgary can only match the terms.
Scroopy Noopers is offline  
Old 05-29-2019, 07:24 AM   #158
JTech780
Powerplay Quarterback
 
JTech780's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DeluxeMoustache View Post
So offer sheets are rare already, and in this case why can’t we recognize they are pretty darn unlikely?

The offer sheeting team would basically need to have 4 first round picks, for starters

https://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/nhl/...angers-gorton/

Avs, Rangers, Kings, Ducks, Sabres each have 2. They would need to do some manoeuvring involving picks for this year and next before even being able to offer sheet.

Then they also would need to have the cap space to add that player.

Now you’d have to be nuts to think the Rangers or Avs throw away the number 2 or 4 overall picks as well as 3 other first rounders for frickin’ Tkachuk. He is good but give your head a shake if you think he is that good. Really.

He is also not even the best RFA out there. Marner, Point, and Raantanen are better and Aho
is at least comparable.

Yeah, I don’t even know why people are talking as though an offer sheet for Tkachuk is a realistic factor here
https://www.capfriendly.com/offer-sheet-calculator

Every team in the league currently has the draft picks available to offer sheet in the upper range.

This year's picks don't count as you can't offer sheet anyone till after the draft anyways.

The picks have to be your own and they have to be in the next 4 consecutive years.
JTech780 is offline  
The Following User Says Thank You to JTech780 For This Useful Post:
Old 05-29-2019, 07:25 AM   #159
Scroopy Noopers
Pent-up
 
Scroopy Noopers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: Plutanamo Bay.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JTech780 View Post
https://www.capfriendly.com/offer-sheet-calculator

Every team in the league currently has the draft picks available to offer sheet in the upper range.

This year's picks don't count as you can't offer sheet anyone till after the draft anyways.

The picks have to be your own and they have to be in the next 4 consecutive years.
No team in the league is giving away 4 years worth of unknown 1st round picks for Tkachuk. It just isn’t happening. I still firmly believe it wouldn’t happen for any player not on McDavids level.
Scroopy Noopers is offline  
Old 05-29-2019, 07:54 AM   #160
Royle9
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

7.75 x 5 years is my educated guess
Royle9 is offline  
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:27 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021