Coastal Gaslink pipeline protestors don't repressent us

[CaptainCrunch]

https://nationalpost.com/opinion/opi...t-represent-us


Opt ed piece that talks about the Coastal Pipeline protesters and the split between the Hereditary and elected chiefs.

We are members of the Gidimt’en Clan of the Wet’suwet’en Nation, together with extended family members from other Wet’suwet’en house groups and communities, both on- and off-reserve. Our clan territories include the area where the Coastal GasLink pipeline crosses the river we call Wedzin Kwa. We are deeply hurt and angered by the conduct and statements of some of our community members and others who claim to be defending our lands and laws against the pipeline.
Our concerns are not about the pipeline itself. Some of us support it, some of us do not and some are neutral. Our issue is that our traditions and way of life are being misrepresented and dishonoured by a small group of protesters, many of whom are neither Gidimt’en nor Wet’suwet’en, but nonetheless claim to be acting in our name to protest natural gas development. On Nov. 20 and 21, we convened a virtual meeting to discuss these issues and the recent RCMP raid that was carried out on our ancestral lands.

Lots to upack in this opt-ed

This rift originally stems from an internal dispute that took place in the feast hall and, although we do not wish to discuss clan business publicly, we will say that our matriarchs have been disrespected, bullied, marginalized and mistreated by those who are enabling the spokesperson’s influence on nowh yintah.
The protesters have also taken it upon themselves to invite violent people into our territories. We are not violent people. We settle our issues with dialogue and respect. We do not need “warriors” from other First Nations or non-Wet’suwet’en protesters to protect us or speak for us, especially when so many Gidimt’en and so many Wet’suwet’en do not support them. This adversarial approach places our community members at risk, and increases the risk to Wet’suwet’en women, including those who are hereditary chiefs. Remember, we live along the “Highway of Tears.”

Then, there is the money. In our culture, money that is raised in the clan’s name is accounted for through the feast system. However, we have received no accounting for the many thousands of dollars in donations that are being collected by protesters in our name.
Worst of all, and what causes us to come forward at this time, is that the protesters who claim to respect Wet’suwet’en law showed no respect whatsoever for two of our leading matriarchs who died in recent weeks, or for their families. It is a basic rule in our culture that non-essential activities must cease during a period of mourning; however, protests and public activities carried on as if nothing had happened.

We want the protesters to cease their blockades and for them to stop misleading people and making false claims about our laws. This letter arises from the voices and concerns of a number of Wet’suwet’en matriarchs, Gidimt’en matriarchs, Gidimt’en clan members and members of other clans. We have the right to share our thoughts and concerns about our territory without backlash from those within our nation, but also from non-Wet’suwet’en people who have little or no understanding of our culture, our history, our internal dynamics or our ancestral ways.

[RichieRich]

Thanks.
This just shows how protesters by proxy are a real problem.
A friend of a friend is a Police member on Vancouver Island. It’s incredible the stories we hear of abuse of the police AND of the actual land occupants by the imported protestors many of whom have zero affiliation except looking for handouts and creating drama. He also relayed how some of the protestors living conditions and food were better than those already there.

[Northendzone]

Funny how the celebrities only hear one voice in this discussion.

Guess they don’t want regular folk to have economic prosperity and what not.

[peter12]

It's more complicated than this all makes it out to be. There is a real dislocation between elected band councils under the Indian Act and the hereditary chief system.

[iggy_oi]

Captain don’t you think the thread title could use a little work? Or at the very least some quotation marks?

[Fighting Banana Slug]

The elected/hereditary chief is a real issue. I think the op ed points out that, in this case, there is a serious rift as to the proper roles within the hereditary portion of that leadership group. That is what is making this issue so difficult.

[RichieRich]

Originally Posted by Northendzone

Funny how the celebrities only hear one voice in this discussion.

Guess they don’t want regular folk to have economic prosperity and what not.

Also "funny" how too many people only hear celebrities.
Or politicians
Or media
Or or or....