Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 02-26-2018, 07:40 AM   #1
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Icon26 Sens trade Ian Cole to BJs for a 2020 3rd and Nick Moutrey

https://twitter.com/user/status/968133645650206720

https://twitter.com/user/status/968134033283649536
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2018, 07:50 AM   #2
neo45
#1 Goaltender
 
neo45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Exp:
Default

Seems cheap consider its a 2020 pick?
neo45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2018, 07:51 AM   #3
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SW Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by neo45 View Post
Seems cheap consider its a 2020 pick?
That's what I thought too# but if they desperately wanted to flip him maybe their wasn't much interest
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2018, 08:48 AM   #4
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Pretty much establishes the value of Stone.

Did the Flames have to pay a premium to get Stone to stay in Calgary? or was it just a bad evaluation of his talent.


Stone sure is not 1.4 M better than Cole if at all.

If the Flames were to be thinking about moving Stone they would have to retain 1.5M salary to get a 2020 3rd round pick and a 2nd level prospect.

With the disastrous off season: Hamonic and Stone. The Flames should be looking at whether the Burke / Trevling team is the right management team going forward.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2018, 08:49 AM   #5
shotinthebacklund
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: CGY
Exp:
Default

when you come across a post like this ^ and wonder what is going on... then. O I forgot to sign in!
shotinthebacklund is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2018, 08:51 AM   #6
rohara66
First Line Centre
 
rohara66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Pretty much establishes the value of Stone.

Did the Flames have to pay a premium to get Stone to stay in Calgary? or was it just a bad evaluation of his talent.


Stone sure is not 1.4 M better than Cole if at all.

If the Flames were to be thinking about moving Stone they would have to retain 1.5M salary to get a 2020 3rd round pick and a 2nd level prospect.

With the disastrous off season: Hamonic and Stone. The Flames should be looking at whether the Burke / Trevling team is the right management team going forward.
I must have missed the memo..... since when was Stone such a terrible defenseman?
rohara66 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to rohara66 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2018, 08:53 AM   #7
kukkudo
#1 Goaltender
 
kukkudo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Pretty much establishes the value of Stone.

Did the Flames have to pay a premium to get Stone to stay in Calgary? or was it just a bad evaluation of his talent.


Stone sure is not 1.4 M better than Cole if at all.

If the Flames were to be thinking about moving Stone they would have to retain 1.5M salary to get a 2020 3rd round pick and a 2nd level prospect.

With the disastrous off season: Hamonic and Stone. The Flames should be looking at whether the Burke / Trevling team is the right management team going forward.
Did you brush your teeth or eat breakfast yet before you started your usual I hate the Calgary Flames bs.
kukkudo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2018, 08:57 AM   #8
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
Pretty much establishes the value of Stone.

Did the Flames have to pay a premium to get Stone to stay in Calgary? or was it just a bad evaluation of his talent.


Stone sure is not 1.4 M better than Cole if at all.

If the Flames were to be thinking about moving Stone they would have to retain 1.5M salary to get a 2020 3rd round pick and a 2nd level prospect.

With the disastrous off season: Hamonic and Stone. The Flames should be looking at whether the Burke / Trevling team is the right management team going forward.

Stone is fine . What's your beef with Hamonic? If anything this deadline is showing flames really didn't overpay for him. A #4 cost controlled dman does not come cheap. I truly believe that some posters think a 1st round pick gets you Malkin.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2018, 08:57 AM   #9
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kukkudo View Post
Did you brush your teeth or eat breakfast yet before you started your usual I hate the Calgary Flames bs.
I don't hate Calgary... What do the Flames need more ... a 20 goal RW or a good journeyman #5 D-man?
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2018, 08:59 AM   #10
smiggy77
Powerplay Quarterback
 
smiggy77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

It's typical Ricardo. A lot of shortsightedness and lack of understanding that market value changes every year.

Oh yes, and lets judge Stone. Have you even watched him this season?
__________________
"You're a wizard, Johnny Tre"
smiggy77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2018, 09:03 AM   #11
btimbit
Franchise Player
 
btimbit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SW Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rohara66 View Post
I must have missed the memo..... since when was Stone such a terrible defenseman?
No kidding. I've liked what Stone has brought to the table for Calgary. No issues with him at all.

We've been so lucky with injuries the dmen. Let's not throw away a guy that could step up to the 2nd pairing and not skip a beat just because he's not flashy
btimbit is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2018, 09:04 AM   #12
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
Stone is fine . What's your beef with Hamonic? If anything this deadline is showing flames really didn't overpay for him. A #4 cost controlled dman does not come cheap. I truly believe that some posters think a 1st round pick gets you Malkin.
A first round pick can get you Tkachuk and even a middle round first rounder should get you a Valimaki.

Either one one on their own is better than Hamonic.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2018, 09:05 AM   #13
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Who is a better d-man Stone or Cole?
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2018, 09:05 AM   #14
CorsiHockeyLeague
Franchise Player
 
CorsiHockeyLeague's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Exp:
Default

He's kind of right, though; I don't know that Stone has all THAT much more value than Ian Cole. He has a better shot and plays more minutes. Cole prevents shots better. Any incremental value is at least partially offset by the cap hit difference. I don't see a basis for suggesting that they would yield wildly different returns, unless you want to argue that the Pens got fleeced here.

Of course, the Flames don't have to trade Stone at all.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
CorsiHockeyLeague is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2018, 09:11 AM   #15
GioforPM
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Springbank
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
A first round pick can get you Tkachuk and even a middle round first rounder should get you a Valimaki.

Either one one on their own is better than Hamonic.
You are talking about what they can turn into. In that case, a first round pick can get you Dylan Strome and even a middle round pick can get you Mark McNeill.

I can tell you this - I'm not trading Tkachuk for any first round pick in 2018. And you'd have to really sell me on a high pick for Valimaki. I know what I have in those guys, especially Tkachuk. Even Dahlin isn't a sure thing.
GioforPM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2018, 09:12 AM   #16
kyuss275
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by ricardodw View Post
A first round pick can get you Tkachuk and even a middle round first rounder should get you a Valimaki.

Either one one on their own is better than Hamonic.
A first round pick can also get you Poitier or klimchuck.
kyuss275 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to kyuss275 For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2018, 09:19 AM   #17
the2bears
Franchise Player
 
the2bears's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Bay Area
Exp:
Default

the2bears is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to the2bears For This Useful Post:
Old 02-26-2018, 09:21 AM   #18
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by CorsiHockeyLeague View Post
He's kind of right, though; I don't know that Stone has all THAT much more value than Ian Cole. He has a better shot and plays more minutes. Cole prevents shots better. Any incremental value is at least partially offset by the cap hit difference. I don't see a basis for suggesting that they would yield wildly different returns, unless you want to argue that the Pens got fleeced here.

Of course, the Flames don't have to trade Stone at all.
Minor point

Cole played 17:37 Min/game with the Pens. Stone 16:08 with the Flames.

I am saying that they are pretty much equivalent except that Cole actually played significant minutes (49 games) in the last 2 SC runs and was a +8
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2018, 09:30 AM   #19
ricardodw
Franchise Player
 
ricardodw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by kyuss275 View Post
A first round pick can also get you Poitier or klimchuck.
They chance of success of 1st round picks is improving every year. Look at the 2015 draft 2 years later. Out of the 30 player drafted there would be 20 that are better than Hamonic right now and the other 10 are not write offs.


You picked 2 of the 7-8 bad picks out of the 2013 1st round. Flames traded for one more out of that class.
ricardodw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2018, 09:33 AM   #20
EldrickOnIce
Franchise Player
 
EldrickOnIce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Chicago
Exp:
Default

Hamonic has been very solid for a long time now.
The 'value' of Stone is likely a 2nd round pick.
Is he worth more to the Flames down the stretch? Probably
If that second round pick helps get you a scoring right winger, does that make it worth it? Probably
Would I rather they moved Stone than one of the young D prospects? yes
EldrickOnIce is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:31 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021