View Poll Results: If the election were held today, which party/ candidate of a party would you be votin
|
Alberta Party
|
|
1 |
50.00% |
United Conservative Party
|
|
0 |
0% |
New Democratic Party
|
|
0 |
0% |
Alberta Liberal Party
|
|
0 |
0% |
Freedom Conservative Party
|
|
0 |
0% |
Other
|
|
0 |
0% |
I will not vote in this election
|
|
0 |
0% |
Undecided
|
|
1 |
50.00% |
03-31-2019, 01:03 AM
|
#201
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weitz
Thanks I was hoping for an explanation.
|
No problem.
Your post strongly suggested you needed one.
|
|
|
03-31-2019, 10:02 AM
|
#202
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by iggy_oi
It’s not just technically right. It’s a fact. Many union members/supporters will vote UCP in this election and you’d probably be surprised by how many more would vote for the UCP if their platform didn’t include promises to repeal pro-union legislation.
|
Mostly agree with this post. I know many union members who will never vote NDP. Most of them are heavily in favour of the UCP policy on certification too.
|
|
|
03-31-2019, 10:10 AM
|
#203
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainYooh
My wife is a teacher too. Overwhelming majority of the staff in her school is going to vote NDP, no matter what. Unions will always back NDP, especially, when their party has a decent chance to stay in power. More vocal/active staff members go as far as preaching how NOT voting for NDP is akin to betraying "the progress made". I think it is pretty naive to believe that their motivation is purely education-centered and not financial.
|
How do you decide who you vote for?
Many people just vote straight on pocket book.
|
|
|
03-31-2019, 10:39 AM
|
#204
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lubicon
Most of them are heavily in favour of the UCP policy on certification too.
|
That’s interesting, I haven’t met or heard of a single union member who has been in favour of this change, let alone heavily in favour of it. Not saying your statement isn’t true, I’m just surprised that you’ve managed to find so many people heavily in favour of this change.
|
|
|
03-31-2019, 05:18 PM
|
#205
|
First Line Centre
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Calgary
|
I got the Freedom Conservative Party followed closely by the Green Party on the voting compass. Is that an indictment of my character or the Voting Compass?
|
|
|
04-01-2019, 10:23 AM
|
#206
|
Powerplay Quarterback
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
How do you decide who you vote for?
Many people just vote straight on pocket book.
|
I vote for the party who's values most represent my own.
In the long run it's more important than how many more or less dollars I have in my wallet at the end of the day.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to craigwd For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-01-2019, 10:40 AM
|
#207
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by iggy_oi
That’s interesting, I haven’t met or heard of a single union member who has been in favour of this change, let alone heavily in favour of it. Not saying your statement isn’t true, I’m just surprised that you’ve managed to find so many people heavily in favour of this change.
|
Admittedly the sample is limited to a single employer that was certified based on the newer rules. These people are not happy with the result and feel they were never given the chance to have their say on the matter as it never went to a vote.
|
|
|
04-01-2019, 10:52 AM
|
#208
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: San Fernando Valley
|
I'm not voting for the Freedom Conservative Party but I happened to see their Foothills Candidate in person and she's an absolute stunner.
|
|
|
04-01-2019, 11:15 AM
|
#209
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Erick Estrada
I'm not voting for the Freedom Conservative Party but I happened to see their Foothills Candidate in person and she's an absolute stunner.
|
If we're doing a pageant, Alberta party candidate for Calgary Foothills beats her hands down.
|
|
|
04-01-2019, 11:35 AM
|
#210
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lubicon
Admittedly the sample is limited to a single employer that was certified based on the newer rules. These people are not happy with the result and feel they were never given the chance to have their say on the matter as it never went to a vote.
|
That’s fair enough, but there isn’t anything preventing them from voicing their concerns now. At the end of the day since it’s clear that over 51% of the employees wanted to form a union they would be in the same position with or without the vote.
|
|
|
04-01-2019, 11:55 AM
|
#211
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by iggy_oi
That’s fair enough, but there isn’t anything preventing them from voicing their concerns now. At the end of the day since it’s clear that over 51% of the employees wanted to form a union they would be in the same position with or without the vote.
|
If it's so obvious that people who sign union cards are never pressured into it and would always vote for unions, why does the union movement fight so hard for card-sign certification? Wouldn't a vote be just as good?
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to bizaro86 For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-01-2019, 12:20 PM
|
#212
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
If it's so obvious that people who sign union cards are never pressured into it and would always vote for unions, why does the union movement fight so hard for card-sign certification? Wouldn't a vote be just as good?
|
Employer interference/intimidation during the period between the application being made and the vote actually happening is the issue, it’s usually about a 2 week waiting period. When your boss calls you in for a meeting with no witnesses and threatens to fire you if the vote goes through it can change your mind pretty quickly.
The only recourse at that point is to file a complaint with the board, to do so you will be called to testify against your boss and since there is no certainty of outcome that you will win the case most employees are too scared to do so because if their termination is upheld their complaint will be made public and any other employer considering hiring them would be able to see it after a quick google search of their name. I don’t think most people would disagree that companies might be a little more than hesitant to hire people who took their last employer to court.
On the other side of the coin there is very little retribution a union or a coworker who supported the union could take on an employee who made a complaint about being coerced into signing a card. Your employer certainly isn’t going to dissuade you from doing so either. The automatic certification legislation is there to protect employees and it does just that. Of all the provinces that have such legislation the 65% threshold in Alberta is the highest. It’s an absolute joke that Kenney is going to repeal this and is also very telling of who he is actually looking out for. I’ll give you a hint: it isn’t workers(the majority of Albertans)
Last edited by iggy_oi; 04-01-2019 at 12:23 PM.
|
|
|
04-03-2019, 07:39 PM
|
#213
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by GGG
Not to derail this further but
Injecting aerosols into the stratosphere and carbon capture from the air would be two magic technologies that could prevent or delay global warming.
|
Or, you know, put a stop to the deforestation that has been going on around the world. There's already a technology that's pretty good at removing CO2 from the atmosphere, and it's been around a lot longer than humans have...
Quote:
However if you read the most recent Climate change report its over. We can not prevent significant impacts from warming by cutting CO2 emmissions. It’s time to make drastic and more risky interventions.
|
We can't prevent significant impacts (we are already beginning to feel some of them), but it is generally believed that we can still prevent a runaway positive feedback loop, which would make the Earth uninhabitable for humans.
However, if we are to embrace the notion that it's already too late to prevent worldwide coastal flooding and the displacement of hundreds of millions of people, it's time to take a long hard look at accountability. We didn't get to this point by accident, we got to this point by actual decisions being made by actual people.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Mathgod For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-03-2019, 09:02 PM
|
#214
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bizaro86
If it's so obvious that people who sign union cards are never pressured into it and would always vote for unions, why does the union movement fight so hard for card-sign certification? Wouldn't a vote be just as good?
|
Pfft you act like secret ballots are some crazy democratic foundation that lets people vote in private free from coercion or repercussions.
We should probably do away with it altogether and run elections with your union steward collecting the card you ‘choose’ to sign while he and his mates keep a careful eye to make sure you aren’t coerced. It’s the only way to be fair
|
|
|
04-04-2019, 08:11 AM
|
#215
|
First Line Centre
|
Can we reset the poll again this week and next and see how we evolve?
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to puckedoff For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-04-2019, 01:53 PM
|
#216
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by puckedoff
Can we reset the poll again this week and next and see how we evolve?
|
Meteorite is likely to make huge gains.
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
|
|
|
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to DoubleK For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-04-2019, 01:57 PM
|
#217
|
Franchise Player
|
Probably worth making a new thread tomorrow in the wake of the debate.
__________________
"The great promise of the Internet was that more information would automatically yield better decisions. The great disappointment is that more information actually yields more possibilities to confirm what you already believed anyway." - Brian Eno
|
|
|
04-04-2019, 02:02 PM
|
#218
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: SW Calgary
|
I agree, after the debate is a good idea
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to btimbit For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-04-2019, 05:49 PM
|
#219
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Seattle, WA
|
Sorry if already posted. . .
There is some gold in the drinking game.
https://www.macleans.ca/politics/the...ey-must-avoid/
Edit: posted on the wrong thread
__________________
It's only game. Why you heff to be mad?
Last edited by DoubleK; 04-04-2019 at 07:45 PM.
|
|
|
04-05-2019, 09:47 AM
|
#220
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: May 2016
Location: ATCO Field, Section 201
|
How about that new poll?
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheIronMaiden For This Useful Post:
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:56 PM.
|
|