2022 Freedumb Convoy(s) Thread

[Minnie]

Originally Posted by surferguy

Link?

They ended. If I see it pop up again, I'll link.

[TorqueDog]

Originally Posted by Azure

Either way, it is concerning that the list was leaked. I'm not surprised that people are actually looking at it to see if 'certain' people donated. Gotta keep canceling.

It is concerning how certain posters seem to carry a torch for these dickheads and morons who are actively working to prolong this stupid sh-t.

[MoneyGuy]

So that’s a parody that lured in some real convoy idiots? They had me fooled for awhile. It was hilarious.

[corporatejay]

Originally Posted by TorqueDog

It is concerning how certain posters seem to carry a torch for these dickheads and morons who are actively working to prolong this stupid sh-t.

I agree. Anyone who doesn't share the same opinion as me should lose their job and be socially shamed.

[flames_fan_down_under]

Originally Posted by Ducay

Well that part is news to me. Like I said, I don't really follow it nor support the wackyness/approach its turned to.



Yes because Im sure this live feed that is going viral definitely hasn't attracted anyone trying to give it a bad name . Its like people who take the nazi flags that show up at every gathering as anything beyond someone being a bad actor. And even then, bad actor or real racist doesn't mean the whole thing is racist if 99.90% of people have zero care or involvement in race about this thing besides it being a way to disparage the movement.

Its the 2020's version of calling someone a communist

So you don't follow their movement or support their tactics but happily criticize those that don't support them? Or is this just a "the lefty libs are desperate to cancel" angle? Because there are posters here from all political stripes who don't support this movement because quite simply they are an anti-democratic movement who's stated goal is to remove an elected leader and have created illegal blockades ensuring that even more people feel economic hardship during a time when people are already struggling.

[topfiverecords]

Originally Posted by Azure

Because how dare you support something that I don't.

Either way, it is concerning that the list was leaked. I'm not surprised that people are actually looking at it to see if 'certain' people donated. Gotta keep canceling.

No law that says I can’t have an ignore list in real life too.

[Captain Otto]

Originally Posted by corporatejay

I agree. Anyone who doesn't share the same opinion as me should lose their job and be socially shamed.

No, anyone who actively denies science, creates and spreads misinformation, supports a group who's membership wants to overthrow a democratically elected government and continues to impose economic hardships on people by blocking essential commodities simply because they don't get their way, should lose their job and be socially shamed.

Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk

[TorqueDog]

Originally Posted by corporatejay

I agree. Anyone who doesn't share the same opinion as me should lose their job and be socially shamed.

Doing stupid sh-t deserves some degree of shame. Feeling shame is how people learn not to do stupid sh-t, it’s a very important tool.

Speaking of stupid sh-t, is that what you think is happening at our border crossings, a mere difference of opinion? Seriously?

[Cappy]

Originally Posted by corporatejay

I agree. Anyone who doesn't share the same opinion as me should lose their job and be socially shamed.

That’s up to the company employing them, is it not?

[Yamer]

"They have a different opinion" used to dismiss objections towards literal sedition is hilarious.

[Elkyiv]

is the donor list still online somewhere where one could access it? if anyone knows, could you DM me a link? thanks in advance.

[BoLevi]

Originally Posted by Yamer

"They have a different opinion" used to dismiss objections towards literal sedition is hilarious.

People who are fighting against the significant over-reach of the current gov't aren't seditious. The notion is preposterous.

Especially since Trudeau invoked the War Measures act....er... "Emergencies Act", and proved them correct.

[SebC]

Originally Posted by BoLevi

People who are fighting against the significant over-reach of the current gov't aren't seditious. The notion is preposterous.

Especially since Trudeau invoked the War Measures act....er... "Emergencies Act", and proved them correct.

It's awfully convenient for you to know what 'preposterous' means but not 'seditious'. But I'll help you out anyways: "conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch". So your average protester may not be seditious, but the leaders certainly are.

You are the most aggravating poster on this board because you cannot possibly be stupid enough to believe the stuff you say, yet you'll try to convince everyone else.

[BoLevi]

Originally Posted by SebC

It's awfully convenient for you to know what 'preposterous' means but not 'seditious'. But I'll help you out anyways: "conduct or speech inciting people to rebel against the authority of a state or monarch". So your average protester may not be seditious, but the leaders certainly are.

You are the most aggravating poster on this board because you cannot possibly be stupid enough to believe the stuff you say, yet you'll try to convince everyone else.

The post I was quoting was using the term much more broadly. Words like "seditious" should be used sparingly and with specificity.

[SebC]

Originally Posted by BoLevi

The post I was quoting was using the term much more broadly. Words like "seditious" should be used sparingly and with specificity.

But that has nothing to do with the what you actually presented, which was that the government's actions make it not seditious, whereas one can be seditious even towards a completely authoritarian government.

[starseed]

https://twitter.com/gordperks/status...OPecdm77A&s=19

Maybe we should start putting sanctions on individuals from the Cayman islands in retaliation.

[Erick Estrada]

Originally Posted by Captain Otto

No, anyone who actively denies science, creates and spreads misinformation, supports a group who's membership wants to overthrow a democratically elected government and continues to impose economic hardships on people by blocking essential commodities simply because they don't get their way, should lose their job and be socially shamed.

Sent from my Pixel 6 Pro using Tapatalk

Yeah this is just wrong. Nobody will ever convince me that public shaming is anything but moving in the wrong direction as a society. Also when it comes to employment someone losing their job should always come at the discretion of the employer only.

[Scroopy Noopers]

Originally Posted by corporatejay

I agree. Anyone who doesn't share the same opinion as me should lose their job and be socially shamed.

Pathetic.

[Fuzz]

https://twitter.com/user/status/1493420991573286912


Holy crap, the chickens are fleeing the Coutts!

Claim to be leaving by 10am today.

[Captain Otto]

Originally Posted by Fuzz

https://twitter.com/user/status/1493420991573286912


Holy crap, the chickens are fleeing the Coutts!

Claim to be leaving by 10am today.

Heroes!!! In the interest of peace he says. Ya, before the Mounties raided us we were all for staying forever, but now, since we lost our guns and ammo, we are leaving peacefully.

What a complete clown show.