Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 01-25-2018, 01:59 PM   #281
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
Just tell me why you wouldn't re-sign Backlund right now and then trade him if Jankowski develops into the player you believe he will in the future? Why glut your centre depth, the most important position in hockey, based on hope?
I would at the right price and have said so multiple times. Isn't that what all this is about? Right now that price appears to be out of the level the Flames are agreeable to.

Again, he may have far more value to someone else, and knows that, which is why he would want to get to July 1 instead of re-upping with the Flames at what they can afford/value him at..

Also, he may (and likely will) want a NTC as part of any deal he signs. That then diminishes what you can get for him in the future.

The single biggest part of this discussion is whether or not the Flames can gamble and see him possibly walk away for absolutely nothing. IMO there is NO way that can be allowed to happen.
__________________
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2018, 02:02 PM   #282
Ashasx
Franchise Player
 
Ashasx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Exp:
Default

So we're talking instead about signing Backlund at the wrong price?

Of course we want him on a good contract. And almost every good player coming out of restricted free agency gets a no trade clause.
Ashasx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2018, 02:17 PM   #283
transplant99
Fearmongerer
 
transplant99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Wondering when # became hashtag and not a number sign.
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashasx View Post
So we're talking instead about signing Backlund at the wrong price?

Of course we want him on a good contract. And almost every good player coming out of restricted free agency gets a no trade clause.
We are talking about either getting him re-signed or trading him. Either way it will have to be decided before Feb 28.

Unless, as i noted earlier, you think BT is willing to gamble that Backlund wont go to July 1. I dont think BT is a big gambler myself.

As for getting a NTC....yes which is why it diminishes the return on him. You limit the buyers market.
__________________
transplant99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2018, 10:46 PM   #284
Classic_Sniper
#1 Goaltender
 
Classic_Sniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Exp:
Default

Backlund was unbelievable today. That game should prove to anyone that he’s a player you can count on against tough circumstances. His chemistry with Tkachuk is also undeniable. He’s an easy re-sign for me if indeed it’s closer to $5M than $6M.
Classic_Sniper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2018, 10:51 PM   #285
dino7c
Franchise Player
 
dino7c's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Exp:
Default

That setup on the tying goal was pretty awesome
__________________
GFG
dino7c is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:56 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021