Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > Fire on Ice: The Calgary Flames Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12-05-2018, 08:51 AM   #1
sureLoss
Some kinda newsbreaker!
 
sureLoss's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Learning Phaneufs skating style
Exp:
Icon48 Forbes NHL Valuations 2018

https://www.forbes.com/sites/mikeoza.../#2ec83bb350e2

Just the list: https://www.forbes.com/nhl-valuations/list/

Top 5
NYR $1.55 B
TOR $1.45 B
MTL $1.3 B
CHI $1.05B
BOS $0.925B


Bottom 5
ARI $290M
FLA $295M
CBJ $320M
BUF $375M
WIN $415M


Calgary comes in at #20 at $450M

They also calculate the average operating income for NHL teams was $25 million an increase of 39% from the previous season.

Some interesting speculation on future TV deals. They are expecting the US national TV deal to at least double going from an average of $200 million/year to more than $400 million/year.

Also reporting that the Caps and Sabres are getting $35 million and $25 million a season respectively for local TV deals. Looks like there are still some rich TV deals to be had in the US.

Last edited by sureLoss; 12-05-2018 at 09:06 AM.
sureLoss is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sureLoss For This Useful Post:
Old 12-05-2018, 09:00 AM   #2
Bingo
Owner
 
Bingo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Always some debate about what is included etc, but from Forbes list to Forbes list there are sure less teams losing money than 5 or so years ago.

Hard to search now as they've written over their links, but I remember years where you had 7 wealthy teams 10 middling teams and then 13 teams losing money, five losing a lot.
Bingo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2018, 09:10 AM   #3
Samuelsson
Crash and Bang Winger
 
Samuelsson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: England
Exp:
Default

Interesting to see the fluctuation. Would adding a team i.e Seattle saturate these numbers a bit? Especially to do with TV deals etc.

In the same vein, I assume that moving some of the lower-earning teams like Arizona or Florida to Quebec or Hamilton/Houston would increase these numbers overall.
__________________
Anders Rasmussen's biggest fan
Samuelsson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2018, 10:51 AM   #4
DJones
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Exp:
Default

Nice to see tv deals in the US are good. Should push the cap up consistently
DJones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2018, 11:00 AM   #5
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

The US TV deal doubling is very optimistic I think. Particularly given the consistent increase in cord cutters.

IMO, it only gets to $400 million a year if one of the digital services - and that could include NBC Online - thinks that hockey could pull people to those services.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Resolute 14 For This Useful Post:
Old 12-05-2018, 11:37 AM   #6
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Exp:
Default

I'm curious why the baseline wouldn't be the expansion team cost. It would cost $600 million to get an NHL team, so isn't that the cheapest they should be worth?
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2018, 11:40 AM   #7
bizaro86
Franchise Player
 
bizaro86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
I'm curious why the baseline wouldn't be the expansion team cost. It would cost $600 million to get an NHL team, so isn't that the cheapest they should be worth?
It's only worth that in a new market. If you want to move, you have to pay a big fee, which would come off the $500-$600 MM.

Plus, under current expansion rules you probably start with a better team than some of the bottom feeders.
bizaro86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2018, 11:40 AM   #8
Jason14h
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
I'm curious why the baseline wouldn't be the expansion team cost. It would cost $600 million to get an NHL team, so isn't that the cheapest they should be worth?

If you have debt or an existing lease that costs $$ to get out of, would de-value.
Jason14h is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2018, 11:53 AM   #9
curves2000
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary, Canada
Exp:
Default

Does anybody have any idea what the Flames TV contracts look like in terms of dollars? Any other Western team like Edmonton or a bigger market like Vancouver?

I am always curious comparing the business side of things between the teams.
curves2000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2018, 12:40 PM   #10
Resolute 14
In the Sin Bin
 
Resolute 14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fuzz View Post
I'm curious why the baseline wouldn't be the expansion team cost. It would cost $600 million to get an NHL team, so isn't that the cheapest they should be worth?
A team's worth is really only what someone might be willing to pay.

If Las Vegas, selling out every night and being hugely popular was worth $500 million at purchase, then it stands to reason that Arizona, drawing half as many actual fans and with far lower revenue potential should be worth far less.
Resolute 14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2018, 01:42 PM   #11
Duffalufagus
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Parkdale
Exp:
Default

The Flames would go up 200mil at least with a new arena.
Duffalufagus is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Duffalufagus For This Useful Post:
Old 12-05-2018, 01:52 PM   #12
Hockey Fan #751
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Resolute 14 View Post
The US TV deal doubling is very optimistic I think. Particularly given the consistent increase in cord cutters.

IMO, it only gets to $400 million a year if one of the digital services - and that could include NBC Online - thinks that hockey could pull people to those services.
I think it finally goes back to ESPN. It makes sense when you consider how strong they're pushing ESPN+ as an online service and also the fact that the league partners with them now very closely as a result of Disney's acquisition of BAM.
Hockey Fan #751 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2018, 04:33 PM   #13
Scornfire
First Line Centre
 
Scornfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Kelowna
Exp:
Default

How could gate receipts possibly only be 60M?
Scornfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2018, 04:42 PM   #14
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scornfire View Post
How could gate receipts possibly only be 60M?
$60 million USD is about $80 million CAD. No playoff games last season puts the per game average (including 4 preseason games) at about $1.8 million Canadian per game. According to ESPN, the Flames averaged 18,905 in attendance per game last season. That works out to about a $95 average ticket price.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-05-2018, 05:19 PM   #15
Scornfire
First Line Centre
 
Scornfire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Kelowna
Exp:
Default

Doh, USD. That makes more sense, Thanks
Scornfire is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:49 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021