Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community
Old 02-02-2011, 11:55 AM   #81
OilKiller
Lifetime Suspension
 
OilKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MickMcGeough View Post
I don't miss Shaw, but I miss HDNet and NFL Network
No HDNet on Telus? Am I reading this right?

If so, total deal breaker...No GGG in HD means no Telus for me.
OilKiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 11:58 AM   #82
Barnes
Franchise Player
 
Barnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Violating Copyrights
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by PsnaP View Post
Are we really still arguing over cat5 and coax??

Define "we". Most of us know what's up...

Any plans for HPNA over power lines or telephone lines?

Last edited by Barnes; 02-02-2011 at 12:14 PM.
Barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 12:05 PM   #83
VladtheImpaler
Franchise Player
 
VladtheImpaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OilKiller View Post
No HDNet on Telus? Am I reading this right?

If so, total deal breaker...No GGG in HD means no Telus for me.
You mean GGW? I watched it a couple of times - kind of boring. No Baz and no Dream is a problem however.
__________________
Cordially as always,
Vlad the Impaler

Please check out http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthr...94#post3726494

VladtheImpaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 12:11 PM   #84
theonlywhiteout
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

i find it insulting to my intelligence to suggest that coaxial cable is just as good as ethernet. splitters, ends, damage to the insultation are all things that make it inferior. under the perfect situation, yes, its as good as ethernet. but thats a faily large difference, isnt it
theonlywhiteout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 12:35 PM   #85
Barnes
Franchise Player
 
Barnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Violating Copyrights
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theonlywhiteout View Post
i find it insulting to my intelligence to suggest that coaxial cable is just as good as ethernet. splitters, ends, damage to the insultation are all things that make it inferior. under the perfect situation, yes, its as good as ethernet. but thats a faily large difference, isnt it
This paragraph alone demonstrates your lack of understanding. Ethernet is not a cable, it is a standard of transmission. Ethernet can be transmitted over any copper wire. I was looking at HDMI over Coax solutions yesterday. Copper is copper.

Please explain how a twisted pair cable is better by a fairly large difference then coax. What you said about Coax can be true of twisted pair cables as well. I didn't realize that buying RG6 with compression fittings was the "perfect situation" and what exactly do you think is going on in between walls that damages insulation?
Barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to Barnes For This Useful Post:
Old 02-02-2011, 12:41 PM   #86
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

I've spent days tracking down a cat5 cable with bad ends.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 01:07 PM   #87
OilKiller
Lifetime Suspension
 
OilKiller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by VladtheImpaler View Post
You mean GGW? I watched it a couple of times - kind of boring. No Baz and no Dream is a problem however.
Yeah, sorry, GGW...got carried away with the G's there.

There is a ton of stuff I watch in HDNet, while GGW is fun to watch when I've got nothing else to do. Not having HDNet overall is a non-starter for me.
OilKiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 01:36 PM   #88
MickMcGeough
First Line Centre
 
MickMcGeough's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by theonlywhiteout View Post
i find it insulting to my intelligence to suggest that coaxial cable is just as good as ethernet. splitters, ends, damage to the insultation are all things that make it inferior. under the perfect situation, yes, its as good as ethernet. but thats a faily large difference, isnt it
I've never seen somebody work so hard to derail their own thread.
__________________

MickMcGeough is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 01:37 PM   #89
theonlywhiteout
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barnes View Post
This paragraph alone demonstrates your lack of understanding. Ethernet is not a cable, it is a standard of transmission. Ethernet can be transmitted over any copper wire. I was looking at HDMI over Coax solutions yesterday. Copper is copper.

Please explain how a twisted pair cable is better by a fairly large difference then coax. What you said about Coax can be true of twisted pair cables as well. I didn't realize that buying RG6 with compression fittings was the "perfect situation" and what exactly do you think is going on in between walls that damages insulation?
o ffs yes, cat 5 cable, cable which i refer to as ethernet in the same way people call tissue kleenex. and yes, spin it all you like but coaxial cable is not as durable or insulated as CAT5/6 cable.
theonlywhiteout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 01:43 PM   #90
Scoopdogg
Scoring Winger
 
Scoopdogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Ctown
Exp:
Default

Who the eff cares about Coax and Cat5 cables. Lets get back on topic as I am considering the switch to Optik TV as well and this thread has some good information on the product. I don't care about how they install in my house, just as long as they can install it with the 3 hd and 1 sd feeds.
Scoopdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 01:52 PM   #91
theonlywhiteout
Lifetime Suspension
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Ya Your right enough with this debate. any questions fire away
theonlywhiteout is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 02:04 PM   #92
nik-
Franchise Player
 
nik-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nik- View Post
I'm thinking of making the switch here. Anyone live in Sunnyside and have Telus DSL who can relate any speed anecdotes?
Now that the Cat6 Coax wars have ended ... anyone?
nik- is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 02:22 PM   #93
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

But, but, I had a post ready about insulation vs. shielding for cat5/6 vs. RG6..

Must. Let. It. Go.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to photon For This Useful Post:
Old 02-02-2011, 02:23 PM   #94
Barnes
Franchise Player
 
Barnes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Violating Copyrights
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scoopdogg View Post
Who the eff cares about Coax and Cat5 cables. Lets get back on topic as I am considering the switch to Optik TV as well and this thread has some good information on the product. I don't care about how they install in my house, just as long as they can install it with the 3 hd and 1 sd feeds.
You're right. theonlywhiteout telling people that coax is inferior to cat5e/6 cable in Telus's IPTV setup has no relevence to anyone interested in using or having Optik installed. This Optik thread has been derailed for far too long with Optik discussion.
Barnes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 02:26 PM   #95
Cecil Terwilliger
That Crazy Guy at the Bus Stop
 
Cecil Terwilliger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield Penitentiary
Exp:
Default

You guys know that multiple discussions can take place at once right?

Some people can talk about cat5/coax. Others can still discuss other parts of Optik.

If posters are really smart they can even talk about coax vs cat5 in the same posts that they talk about other parts of Optik.
Cecil Terwilliger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 02:33 PM   #96
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Do they have it seutp anywhere to view? I guess my biggest hesitation is I'm skeptical of the ability to deliver actual HD content at such low bitrates. Netflix's "HD" for example.

It's a huge hassle to switch (if you do Internet, TV, and Phone all at once), and switching back if I wasn't happy with the TV quality or the speed of the Internet would really REALLY suck.
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 02:34 PM   #97
silentsim
#1 Goaltender
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW calgary
Exp:
Default

well if it makes any difference, when I got Optik TV i felt the picture quality was better then what I was getting on Shaw (HD)
silentsim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 02:35 PM   #98
VladtheImpaler
Franchise Player
 
VladtheImpaler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by OilKiller View Post
Yeah, sorry, GGW...got carried away with the G's there.

There is a ton of stuff I watch in HDNet, while GGW is fun to watch when I've got nothing else to do. Not having HDNet overall is a non-starter for me.
GGG is something else altogether, and if HD Net had that on... Just google "GGG German porn".
__________________
Cordially as always,
Vlad the Impaler

Please check out http://forum.calgarypuck.com/showthr...94#post3726494

VladtheImpaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 02:37 PM   #99
photon
The new goggles also do nothing.
 
photon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by silentsim View Post
well if it makes any difference, when I got Optik TV i felt the picture quality was better then what I was getting on Shaw (HD)
I've got Starchoice right now, not sure how Shaw's cable HD compares but I've read that it's inferior to Starchoice (or Shaw Direct or whatever it is now).
__________________
Uncertainty is an uncomfortable position.
But certainty is an absurd one.
photon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-02-2011, 02:43 PM   #100
Old Yeller
First Line Centre
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Exp:
Default

So how much are you guys on Optik paying right now? How much will you be paying in 3 months? How much in a year?

On Shaw with basic phone/normal internet/HD TV with sports package I'm paying around $90 a month for the next year (because I called to say I was switching to Telus) and then it'll go back up to $120.

I'm quite interested in Optik just because of the guide and the PVR anywhere. Question about the PVR anywhere functionality as I don't really understand it... can you only actually pause live TV on the TV that's actually hooked up to the PVR? Or do you get STB for other TV's in the house that extend the PVR functionality to those other TV's?

Also if I was planning to hang myself, would coax or cat5 work better?
Old Yeller is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:07 PM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021