Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community

Go Back   Calgarypuck Forums - The Unofficial Calgary Flames Fan Community > Main Forums > The Off Topic Forum
Register Forum Rules FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 11-18-2021, 01:44 PM   #441
woob
#1 Goaltender
 
woob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog View Post
My office is along 9 Ave, I suspect the traffic snarls are going to get nasty with the lack of capacity on 2 St.
My office parking is off 2st SW. Does that mean I can look forward to no office parking for X amount of time? /firstworldproblems.
woob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2021, 02:26 PM   #442
Lubicon
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog View Post
Oh man, a cut and cover project along 2 St SW?

Fuuuuuuuck that is going to be awful.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorqueDog View Post
My office is along 9 Ave, I suspect the traffic snarls are going to get nasty with the lack of capacity on 2 St.
Hoping they could do most of the cutting along 2nd Street itself and leave the intersections alone, then dig/tunnel that small portion rather than having to rip up the street in it's entirety. Is that possible?
Lubicon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2021, 02:31 PM   #443
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lubicon View Post
Hoping they could do most of the cutting along 2nd Street itself and leave the intersections alone, then dig/tunnel that small portion rather than having to rip up the street in it's entirety. Is that possible?
I doubt it. Most streets are full of utilities that are all going to need relocating before the tunnel itself. I remember the centre st and 16th ave crossing took an eternity to rebuild because there is so much stuff under there. Unless this street happens to have not much there, I'd expect a long term dig.
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2021, 02:54 PM   #444
jwslam
Scoring Winger
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Exp:
Default

https://globalnews.ca/news/8382690/c...cles-supplier/
City of Calgary picks Spanish railway car manufacturer for Green Line CTrain contract

Worked for a company that's been there done that.
Hired a Spanish company because they came in with the lowest bid.
Nobody in Spain knows how to design for temperatures below 10°C... let alone the freezing and snow we have here.
Ended up spending 3x as much fixing all the failed designs to accommodate our weather. At least that's all private money through that company.

Yay now my tax monies get to do the same thing!
jwslam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2021, 02:56 PM   #445
Fuzz
Franchise Player
 
Fuzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Exp:
Default

I'm confused, is that your prediction of what will happen?
Fuzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2021, 03:30 PM   #446
getbak
Franchise Player
 
getbak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

It looks like they've supplied the same model of trains to cities in Norway, Sweden, and Germany (among others) in cold weather climates. This doesn't appear to be unproven technology.
__________________
Turn up the good, turn down the suck!
getbak is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to getbak For This Useful Post:
Old 11-18-2021, 03:40 PM   #447
Nufy
Franchise Player
 
Nufy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by zamler View Post
I had to

Go Riders ?
__________________
Nufy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-18-2021, 04:40 PM   #448
You Need a Thneed
Voted for Kodos
 
You Need a Thneed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lubicon View Post
Hoping they could do most of the cutting along 2nd Street itself and leave the intersections alone, then dig/tunnel that small portion rather than having to rip up the street in it's entirety. Is that possible?
They were always going to have to cut and cover the station at 7th/8th Ave anyway, plus the portal out of the ground at eau claire.

They were always going to have to “tunnel” under the CP Rail corridor and the 7th Ave LRT tracks, and this is going under the existing LRT tunnel for the Red line at 11th Ave (I think, not sure if there’s enough room above).

In short, it was never a question of picking 0% disruption or 100% disruption. Full cut and cover will be more disruption, yes, but between the station and the portal, 2nd st was going to be a nightmare along the way at some point no matter what.
__________________
My LinkedIn Profile.
You Need a Thneed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2022, 03:18 PM   #449
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calga...dget-1.6327069

Not really I surprise, but the project scope should absolutely be reconsidered (BRT instead of LRT)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2022, 03:42 PM   #450
BlackArcher101
Such a pretty girl!
 
BlackArcher101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Is there ridership stats available for the existing lines for 2021 that may give us a picture of future ridership resulting from permanent shift to WFH?
__________________
BlackArcher101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2022, 03:43 PM   #451
lambeburger
Powerplay Quarterback
 
lambeburger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Calgary, AB
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by powderjunkie View Post
https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calga...dget-1.6327069

Not really I surprise, but the project scope should absolutely be reconsidered (BRT instead of LRT)


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Did I read that right? City has already spent $706 million on this before a single shovel has been put in the ground?
lambeburger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2022, 03:47 PM   #452
BlackArcher101
Such a pretty girl!
 
BlackArcher101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lambeburger View Post
Did I read that right? City has already spent $706 million on this before a single shovel has been put in the ground?
There has been a lot of work done, especially near Highfield Blvd & Ogden Rd to build a tunnel under the CP tracks. Lots of earthwork near 24st as well. I believe that includes some land purchases too.

With that in mind, those projects are done, so WHY is construction not even starting this year, or next, but 2024? Of course your budget is out the window....
__________________

Last edited by BlackArcher101; 01-25-2022 at 03:50 PM.
BlackArcher101 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to BlackArcher101 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-25-2022, 03:49 PM   #453
burn_this_city
Franchise Player
 
burn_this_city's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Exp:
Default

This would have been a good project for the downturn, now its going to be expensive and competing with a revitalized O&G industry.
burn_this_city is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to burn_this_city For This Useful Post:
Old 01-25-2022, 03:50 PM   #454
accord1999
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackArcher101 View Post
With that in mind, those projects are done, so WHY is construction not even starting this year, or next, but 2024? Of course your budget is out the window....
From the December Green Line Board meeting, construction start is now delayed to 2024 because they effectively restarted the procurement process when they took over in early 2021 and hired a new CEO and COO last summer.



accord1999 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2022, 03:51 PM   #455
PaperBagger'14
Franchise Player
 
PaperBagger'14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Cowtown
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by lambeburger View Post
Did I read that right? City has already spent $706 million on this before a single shovel has been put in the ground?
There have been tons of utilities relocated for the LRT ROW already as well
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by oilboimcdavid View Post
Eakins wasn't a bad coach, the team just had 2 bad years, they should've been more patient.
PaperBagger'14 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to PaperBagger'14 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-25-2022, 03:52 PM   #456
TorqueDog
Franchise Player
 
TorqueDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Calgary - Centre West
Exp:
Default

This getting pushed back, scrutinized again and again by the province, delayed countless times, new alignments, etc. has not helped cost overruns I'm sure.
__________________
-James
GO
FLAMES GO.
TorqueDog is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TorqueDog For This Useful Post:
Old 01-25-2022, 04:33 PM   #457
Lubicon
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackArcher101 View Post
Is there ridership stats available for the existing lines for 2021 that may give us a picture of future ridership resulting from permanent shift to WFH?
We're not sure WFH is going to be a permanent thing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by burn_this_city View Post
This would have been a good project for the downturn, now its going to be expensive and competing with a revitalized O&G industry.
That is the Calgary (and Alberta) way it seems.
Lubicon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2022, 04:41 PM   #458
accord1999
Powerplay Quarterback
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackArcher101 View Post
Is there ridership stats available for the existing lines for 2021 that may give us a picture of future ridership resulting from permanent shift to WFH?
Still down about 60% from 2019 levels.


accord1999 is online now   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to accord1999 For This Useful Post:
Old 01-25-2022, 04:47 PM   #459
Lubicon
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackArcher101 View Post
Is there ridership stats available for the existing lines for 2021 that may give us a picture of future ridership resulting from permanent shift to WFH?
Quote:
Originally Posted by accord1999 View Post
Still down about 60% from 2019 levels.

DT numbers will likely stay depressed for awhile but keep in mind post secondary ridership numbers will rebound once both big schools (UCalgary and SAIT) return to in person learning in a meaningful and permanent way. Not sure if there is a breakdown on those numbers as a percentage of overall ridership?

Other major events (Flames, Stamps, Stampede) etc. ridership should also rebound once things return to a more normal state.
Lubicon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-25-2022, 05:59 PM   #460
powderjunkie
Franchise Player
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Exp:
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackArcher101 View Post
There has been a lot of work done, especially near Highfield Blvd & Ogden Rd to build a tunnel under the CP tracks. Lots of earthwork near 24st as well. I believe that includes some land purchases too.

With that in mind, those projects are done, so WHY is construction not even starting this year, or next, but 2024? Of course your budget is out the window....
Pretty sure they've built the bridge over Elbow River, too.
powderjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:56 AM.

Calgary Flames
2023-24




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright Calgarypuck 2021