01-22-2024, 08:44 PM
|
#1401
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Flight Level 360
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime
|
Very cool! A friends Extra 330SC is on display at RAMWC for the winter months.
|
|
|
01-22-2024, 09:02 PM
|
#1402
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by timun
I still haven't been on a 737 since all those shenanigans went down.
|
Since the Canadian return to service, I've flown the 737 exactly 24 times. Never MAX 9, but once on a -900ER.
For better or worse, I'm still alive.
|
|
|
01-23-2024, 07:11 AM
|
#1403
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by FLAME ENVY
Very cool! A friends Extra 330SC is on display at RAMWC for the winter months.
|
I believe that is it behind the helicopter on my 3rd shot. I was wondering if that one was in flyable condition too.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bigtime For This Useful Post:
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rayne008 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-23-2024, 05:29 PM
|
#1406
|
Scoring Winger
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Flight Level 360
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime
I believe that is it behind the helicopter on my 3rd shot. I was wondering if that one was in flyable condition too.
|
There's the Extra, I totally missed it! 100% in flyable condition, Luke just got it about a year ago (2008 build) and represented Canada at WAAC 2023 in October/November. It is his competition machine, he also owns an Extra 300L. He provided the 330SC to the museum for display during the winter months.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to FLAME ENVY For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-25-2024, 04:07 PM
|
#1410
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Apartment 5A
|
Pilot forget his phone in Toronto
|
|
|
01-25-2024, 05:39 PM
|
#1411
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stazzy33
|
That is a lot more than halfway to Toronto. I'm surprised they would have enough fuel onboard to go all the way back to Calgary.
|
|
|
01-25-2024, 06:00 PM
|
#1412
|
#1 Goaltender
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by stazzy33
|
I read online that they turned around because of fog in Toronto. Why they didn't just go to Winnipeg has something to do with having the crew where they'd want them the following day. I didn't totally understand this portion of the explanation so, hopefully, Bigtime or someone else can elucidate further.
|
|
|
01-25-2024, 06:11 PM
|
#1413
|
Franchise Player
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David
I read online that they turned around because of fog in Toronto. Why they didn't just go to Winnipeg has something to do with having the crew where they'd want them the following day. I didn't totally understand this portion of the explanation so, hopefully, Bigtime or someone else can elucidate further.
|
They could have probably gone anywhere else in Ontario like Sault St Marie, Sudbury, Windsor, Ottawa or even over to Montreal.
Sitting on planes for ~6 hours to go no where must really suck.
|
|
|
01-26-2024, 06:53 AM
|
#1414
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by D as in David
I read online that they turned around because of fog in Toronto. Why they didn't just go to Winnipeg has something to do with having the crew where they'd want them the following day. I didn't totally understand this portion of the explanation so, hopefully, Bigtime or someone else can elucidate further.
|
Yeah it was weather in YYZ, and the having crew in the right place afterwards was apparently the reason to go all the way back to Calgary. But hey, at least on Porter you wouldn't have been stuck in a middle seat!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bigtime For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-26-2024, 09:55 AM
|
#1415
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Apartment 5A
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime
Yeah it was weather in YYZ, and the having crew in the right place afterwards was apparently the reason to go all the way back to Calgary. But hey, at least on Porter you wouldn't have been stuck in a middle seat!
|
And you don't have to worry about loose bolts on a Embraer
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to KelVarnsen For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-26-2024, 10:04 AM
|
#1416
|
My face is a bum!
|
I had a similar experience when WestJet was leasing the Thomas Cook 757s. We were on the way to Hawaii, well over the Pacific when they started to lose cabin pressure.
We dropped down to a low altitude, and flew at a crawl right over Vancouver and all the way back to Calgary. They could fly their own 737s out of YVR, so the only maintenance operation for the leased 757s was at YYC. Then our crew timed out. That suuuucked.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bill Bumface For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-26-2024, 08:12 PM
|
#1417
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by calgarygeologist
They could have probably gone anywhere else in Ontario like Sault St Marie, Sudbury, Windsor
|
Where there are no bridges, far inferior accomdoations, no ground handling, no fuel contract, no maintenance. Weather was also bad at YOW and YUL. There are some limitations for the Embraer in terms of low visibliity approaches, they can't do what Air Canada/Jazz planes are capable of doing. Some of the Porter crews are so junior they're quite restricted on approaches as well.
It's part of the risk that comes with flying the clown car that is Porter at the moment.
|
|
|
01-26-2024, 08:37 PM
|
#1418
|
#1 Goaltender
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Back in Calgary!!
|
In this case the weather definitely wouldn't have been a surprise. Based on where they turned around, I'm sure they carried additional fuel for exactly this possibility. I don't think a typical IFR fuel load would have allowed a turn back that far into the flight plan. I'm not sure what alternates were being used out east, but it very well could have been a commercial decision that they would rather have them turn back to Calgary and try again the next day rather than end up at their alternate, taking fuel, potentially running into duty day issues, and any other thing that could come up.
Sitting on the airplane for an extra couple hours is probably the least inconvienient thing that could have\would have happened.
Having said all of that it is kind of rare to have a turn back that far into the flight plan between two cities like Calgary and Toronto. I also have no idea how Porter's operation runs, so there could be other factors as well.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to sa226 For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-26-2024, 09:06 PM
|
#1419
|
Franchise Player
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Calgary
|
YYC was not the orginally filed alternate, but Porter ops said a decision was to be made somewhere around Thunder Bay.
|
|
|
01-27-2024, 11:59 AM
|
#1420
|
#1 Goaltender
|
This was what one person on a FB group speculated. It was too far out of my understanding to try and de-cipher what they were saying. YMMV.
Quote:
The RON PD359 would’ve been operated by T911 which was DIV to YOW inbound from MIA. As of right now that tail remains in YOW and therefore PD359 is cancelled tonight.
The HS PD352/Jan 25 would have had no equipment at this point due to the DIV on T911 so rather than cancelling the HS, they had T909 returned to YYC so the schedule won’t be out of sync and those pax on todays 352 won’t be stranded in out-station.
|
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:43 PM.
|
|